Cortisone Injection vs Trigger Point Dry Needling Fin the Treatment of Greater Trochanter Pain Syndrome: A Pilot Study
- Conditions
- Hip Injuries
- Interventions
- Procedure: Trigger Point Dry Needling
- Registration Number
- NCT02639039
- Lead Sponsor
- Scott and White Hospital & Clinic
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if trigger point dry needling (TDN) is as effective as cortisone injection (CI) in reducing pain and improving function in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS).
- Detailed Description
This study aims to investigate the potential of TDN as an effective alternative to CI for patients with GTPS by directly comparing pain and functional outcomes of patients receiving TDN or CI for the treatment of GTPS over a 6 week period. The investigators hypothesize that patients treated with TDN will be equally improved in pain and function as those treated with CI. If TDN is demonstrated to be equally or more effective than steroid injection in this pilot study, then the investigators have the basis to launch larger studies. Ultimately, the investigators want to determine if TDN is an effective treatment alternative for GTPS for providers and patients who want to avoid the potential detrimental side-effects of steroids.
Approach: Prospective, randomized, partially-blinded design
Aim: To determine if administration of TDN is as effective as CI in reducing lateral hip pain and improving function in patients diagnosed with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. The investigators expect to demonstrate effectiveness of TDN in the treatment of GTPS to a degree that is equal to CI. Doing so would prompt further outcomes research for TDN. Supportive research and subsequent clinical acceptance of TDN as a primary treatment for this condition would offer an alternative to patients who want or need to avoid steroids.
Based on the literature, this is the first study to investigate the effectiveness of TDN in the treatment of GTPS and directly compare pain and functional outcomes of patients receiving TDN versus CI for the treatment of GTPS.
Methods. Fifty patients with GTPS will be randomized into a CI or TDN group. Treatment will be administered according to standard of care for up to 6 weeks. Numerical pain and functional ratings for each patient will be collected at 0, 1, 3, and 6 weeks of treatment. Data analysis will determine if TDN is as effective as cortisone.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- 18+ years old
- lateral hip pain (anywhere from iliac crest to mid ITB)
- active email account
- low back pain associated with the hip pain
- motor and/or sensory impairment consistent with radiculopathy
- active infection/malignancy of the hip
- connective tissue disease
- pregnancy
- non-English speaking
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Trigger Point Dry Needling Trigger Point Dry Needling Fifty patients with GTPS will be randomized into a CI or TDN group. Treatment will be carried out at the 1st visit following consent according to SOC. Treatment will be administered according to standard of care for up to 6 weeks. Cortisone Injection Cortisone Injection Fifty patients with GTPS will be randomized into a CI or TDN group. Treatment will be carried out at the 1st visit following consent according to SOC. Treatment will be administered according to standard of care for up to 6 weeks.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient specific function score (PSPS) from baseline to 6 weeks will be accessed. Baseline and 6 weeks Participants change in pain rating scores from baseline to 6 weeks will be accessed. Baseline and 6 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method