MedPath

Evaluation of a Mixed Bowel Prep (2L PEG + Bisacodyl) Versus PEG With Ascorbate

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Colonoscopy
Interventions
Drug: 2L PEG-CS plus bisacodyl
Drug: 2L PEG-ASC
Registration Number
NCT01509131
Lead Sponsor
Promefarm S.r.l.
Brief Summary

It is hypothesized that PEG 2L with citrate and simeticone plus bisacodyl will have similar bowel cleansing efficacy versus PEG 2L with ascorbate. Safety, tolerability, acceptance and compliance of the two reduced volume PEG-based bowel preparation will be also compared.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
408
Inclusion Criteria
  • Out-patients undergoing a complete colonoscopy
  • Patient written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnant or lactating women or at a risk of becoming pregnant
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients
  • History of anaphylaxis to drugs or allergic reactions in general
  • Known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation
  • Toxic megacolon; major colonic resection
  • Heart failure (Class III or IV); severe renal failure; relevant diseases, that may interfere with the aim of the study
  • Phenylketonuria;Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
  • Unwillingness to co-operate and to comply with the requirements of the trial

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
2L PEG-CS plus bisacodyl2L PEG-CS plus bisacodylPatients will be asked to take 2L PEG-CS plus bisacodyl (10-20 mg according to patient bowel habit)
2L PEG-ASC2L PEG-ASCPatients will be asked to take PEG-ASC according to labeling instructions
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluation of the quality of bowel preparation by BBPS20 minutes

BBPS is an established rating scale to evaluate the quality of bowel preparation. A score greater than 6 is considered as success. The rate of success will be compared between the two groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in tolerability between the two groups24 hours

Difference in the percentage of patients in the two groups who developed GI symptoms related to bowel preparation.

Difference in mucosal visibility between the two groups20 minutes

Three point rating scale(0-2).

Number of patients with adverse events24 hours

Patient questioning.

Difference in patients acceptability between the two groups24 hours

Difference in the percentage of patients in the two groups who were willing to repeat the preparation and easy to take the bowel preparation.

Difference in patients compliance between the two groups24 hours

Difference in the percentage of patients who took at least 75% of bowel preparation.

Trial Locations

Locations (5)

Nuovo Regina Margherita

🇮🇹

Roma, Italy

Spedali Civili

🇮🇹

Brescia, Italy

IRCCS Humanitas

🇮🇹

Rozzano, Milano, Italy

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi

🇮🇹

Firenze, Italy

IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza

🇮🇹

San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath