MedPath

Heat Therapy for Fibromyalgia

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Interventions
Other: Heat therapy via hot water immersion
Registration Number
NCT03768947
Lead Sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to see if heat therapy intervention via hot water immersion (i.e., a hot tub) is an effective treatment for patients with Fibromyalgia.

Detailed Description

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a complex and difficult-to-treat painful medical condition and is marked by chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain, decreased pain threshold, and comorbid symptomatology (e.g. fatigue, trouble thinking). Several factors appear to play a role in the pathophysiology of FM: abnormal pain processing, abnormal autonomic nervous and neuroendocrine system function, genetics, and environmental triggers. The prognosis for recovery in traditional medicine is generally poor and current pharmacological treatments for FM are often insufficient to control persistent symptoms. As such, complementary medicine and alternative lifestyle approaches are needed. Heat therapy, such as saunas and hot tubs, has been used historically for its presumed therapeutic benefits, and emerging research highlights the benefits of heat therapy on metabolic and cardiovascular disease risks. Finnish saunas, which result in total-body heating, have shown beneficial clinical effects for rheumatic patients and new studies are needed to determine if heat therapy could improve pain symptoms in patients with FM.

The short-term goal of the investigators is to determine, in a pilot clinical study, that heat therapy intervention via hot water immersion is a safe and efficacious treatment for pain in patients with FM. The overall hypothesis is that heat therapy intervention will improve clinical pain severity and associated dysfunction in a cohort of FM patients and that the anti-inflammatory actions of heat shock proteins may mediate this improvement. The proposed interdisciplinary study will provide data regarding treatment efficacy and will explore potential molecular and physiologic processes that may underlie improvement in pain symptoms after heat therapy intervention for FM. Furthermore, these key pilot studies will provide important preliminary data for future studies.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
8
Inclusion Criteria
  • Informed consent provided by the participant
  • Age 18 to 65 years
  • Diagnosis of FM according to American College of Rheumatology 2011 self-report criteria64
  • Average BPI visual numerical pain score > 4
  • Stable doses of medications for at least 30 days prior to screening
  • Participant agrees to continue the same medication regimen for the study duration
  • FM patients with a sedentary lifestyle (exercise can alter heat shock protein levels)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Age greater than 65 years
  • Previous history of hypotension
  • Pregnancy
  • Current clinically significant disease that would prevent safe heat therapy/hot water immersion (heart conditions such as myocardial infarction, angina, uncontrolled hypertension or kidney disease see below)
  • Reported previous bleeding problems
  • Anti-platelet medication (Plavix), Warfarin, and other anticoagulants (Eliquis, Pradaxa, and Xarelto)
  • Recent rectal, anal, vaginal or prostate surgery
  • Current litigation for fibromyalgia
  • Current disability proceedings
  • Active psychotic or suicidal symptoms
  • Current drug or alcohol abuse
  • Current regular exercise

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Heat Therapy ArmHeat therapy via hot water immersionParticipants in this open-label pilot study will undergo heat therapy via hot water immersion (hot-tub).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Baseline Visual Numerical Pain Score (VNS) at 1 monthBaseline and 1 Month

Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI scores are a numerical rating scale and range from 0 to 10. A score of 0 is equal to no pain and a score of 10 is equal to pain as bad as you can imagine.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) at 1 monthBaseline to 1 Month

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) measures to be included are Depression, Anxiety, Physical Functioning, and Sleep Impairment. Each questionnaire usually has 4-16 response options ranging in value from one to five. The total raw score for a short form with all questions answered is the sum of the values of the response to each question. The total range of potential raw scores depends on the number of questions being asked, for example, a 6 item form would have a range from is 6 to 30. After the raw score is calculated, a T-score metric is used to convert the raw score to a T-score. On the T-score metric, a score of 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that mean. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals "more of the concept being measured", this could be a desirable or undesirable outcome, depending on the concept being measured.

Change from Baseline Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ-R) at 1 monthBaseline and 1 Month

The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ-R) is a measure of symptom severity in fibromyalgia. There is a total of 21 questions and a range of scores from 0 to 210. The higher the score the more severe a person's symptoms.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Kansas Medical Center

🇺🇸

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath