Anti-caries Potential of a Sodium Monofluorophosphate and Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate Dentifrice
- Conditions
- Caries
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT01657877
- Lead Sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Brief Summary
In situ study to compare treatment effect on enamel remineralization potential, measured by surface microhardness recovery (SMHR) and Enamel Fluoride Uptake (EFU). The study will explore the efficacy of an experimental sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP) dentifrice containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate (CSP) in comparison to an experimental SMFP only dentifrice.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Wears a removable bilateral mandibular partial denture that has good stability and support, with sufficient room on each side in the posterior buccal flange area to accommodate two enamel specimens [required dimensions 12 x 7 millimeters (mm)].
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description CSP/SMFP Dentifrice Calcium sodium phosphosilicate Dentifrice containing high fluoride content as SMFP and CSP CSP/SMFP Dentifrice Sodium monoflurophosphate Dentifrice containing high fluoride content as SMFP and CSP SMFP Dentifrice Prototype 1 Sodium monoflurophosphate Dentifrice containing high fluoride content as SMFP and no CSP SMFP Dentifrice Prototype 2 Sodium monoflurophosphate Dentifrice containing low fluoride content as SMFP and no CSP CSP Dentifrice Calcium sodium phosphosilicate Dentifrice containing CSP but no fluoride Placebo Dentifrice Placebo Dentifrice containing no CSP and no fluoride
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage (%) Change in Surface Microhardness (SMH) Following 21 Days of Twice Daily Treatment With the 1500 Ppm Fluoride + 5% CSP Dentifrice and With the 1500 Ppm Fluoride Dentifrice. Baseline to 21 days Percent SMH recovery (SMHR) was calculated from hardness values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after in-situ hardening (R) and after first demineralization challenge (D1) using formula: \[(D1-R)/ (D1-B)\]\*100. A greater percentage change in SMHR represents a better remineralisation and hence a better outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage (%) Change in SMH Following 21 Days of Twice Daily Treatment With 500 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP and 0 % CSP Dentifrice, 0 Ppm Fluoride and 0% CSP, and 0 Ppm Fluoride and 5 % CSP. Baseline to 21 days Percent SMH recovery (SMHR) was calculated from hardness values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after in-situ hardening (R) and after first demineralization challenge (D1) using formula: \[(D1-R)/ (D1-B)\]\*100. A greater percentage change in SMHR represents a better remineralisation and hence a better outcome.
Enamel Fluoride Uptake (EFU) Baseline to 21 days Change to EFU was determine using a microdrill enamel biopsy of the in situ enamel specimens.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Indiana University School of Dentistry
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States