Risk and Importance of Peroperative Nasal Hemorrhage in the Treatment of Lacrimal Duct Obstruction in Young Children
Completed
- Conditions
- Lacrimal Duct Obstruction
- Interventions
- Procedure: "pushed" mono-canaliculonasal intubation
- Registration Number
- NCT02851641
- Lead Sponsor
- Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
- Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate the risk in intra-operative nasal hemorrhage when using a "pushed" probe (Master Ka) in the treatment of naso lacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO).
In the investigator's experience, this risk seemed to minus using a pushed probe rather than the classical pulled-type probes.
A lower risk of hemorrhage could lead to a change in the anesthetic procedure. The gold standard in NLDO is the use of an orotracheal intubation. It could then be replaced by the use of an orolaryngeal mask. A forthcoming study will evaluate the results of this anesthetic change.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 108
Inclusion Criteria
- < 6 years of age
- Unilateral lacrimal duct obstruction with programmed surgery
- Surgery scheduled wih a "pushed" mono-canaliculonasal intubation
- No opposition of parents for he participation of their child
Exclusion Criteria
- Coagulation disorder
- Previous history of nasolacrimal intubation (homo or contra-lateral)
- Non covered by health insurance
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Nasolacrimal duct obstruction "pushed" mono-canaliculonasal intubation -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Nasal hemorrhage Through surgery completion, an average of 1 hour
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Fondation Ophtalmologique A. de Rothschild
🇫🇷Paris, France