An investigation as to which speech samples lead to the most reliable listener judgements when assessing speech in 3-year-old children with cleft palate with or without a cleft lip
- Conditions
- Cleft palate +/- cleft lipGenetic DiseasesCleft lip and cleft palate
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN99721707
- Lead Sponsor
- Coventry University
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 32
1. Children with a diagnosis of cleft palate +/- cleft lip
2. Aged between 36-47 months
3. Treated at a specific Cleft Unit in the UK
4. Children eligible for a speech assessment at age 36-47 months
Healthy volunteers:
1. Children aged 36-47 months at the time of assessment
2. No current or previous involvement with Speech and Language Therapy, nor are waiting for a Speech and Language Therapy initial assessment
3. No medical condition(s) associated with communication impairments
4. Parent(s)/guardian(s) do not have any concerns about their child’s communication
5. Research Team do not have any concerns about the child’s communication
Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs):
1. The individual is currently working as an SLT
2. The SLT has designated sessions working with paediatric Cleft Patients in an NHS Cleft Centre
3. SLT has completed CAPS-A training and has participated in consensus listening in the audit assessment of children at five years of age
Individuals with cleft palate +/- cleft lip:
1. Individuals with Submucous Cleft Palate (SMCP)
2. Individuals with an identified genetic syndrome
3. Individuals from a non-English speaking family
4. Failure/technical problem with the recording of the speech assessment
Control group:
1. Failure/technical problem with the recording of the speech assessment
2. Children from a non-English speaking family
Speech and language therapists:
1. The SLT has carried out the study assessment with either a Cleft or Control Group Participant or has carried out a speech assessment with the Cleft Group Participant in the last year
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method istener reliability ratings for both speech samples using both ordinal and visual analogue scales (VAS) following the collection of the speech sample data: listening session 1 (ordinal), listening session 2, minimum 4 weeks later (ordinal), listening session 3, minimum 4 weeks later (ordinal and VAS)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. The acceptability of the speech samples as judged by Specialist Speech and Language Therapists following the completion of all of the listening sessions<br>2. Completion rates of the speech samples by 3-year-old participants calculated in statistical analysis following the completion of all of the listening sessions