跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/12/099529
CTRI/2025/12/099529尚未招募不适用

A Comparision of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane blocks versus peritubal infiltration for poatoperative analgesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Goverment of Gujarat1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 59 人开始时间: 2026年1月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
59
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare the duration of analgesia.

研究概览

简要总结

Postoperative pain management after PCNL is important as patient have more pain after PCNL. Erector spinae plane blocks provide more pain relief after procedure with injection Ropivacaine 0.25%.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • ASA grade I, II, III undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.
  • Patient having unilateral renal stone who is undergoing for PCNL willingness of patient.

排除标准

  • ASA grade IV,V.
  • Patient having bilateral renal stone.
  • Contraindication to giving block.
  • Patient having neuromuscular disorder and neurological symptoms.
  • Patient giving negative consent for procedure.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the duration of analgesia.

时间窗: To compare duration of analgesia, in first 24 hours.

次要结局

  • To monitor and compare the incidence of adverse effect.(Postoperative 24 hours.)
  • To assess postoperative hemodynamic parameter in both groups.(Postoperative 24 hours.)

研究者

发起方
Goverment of Gujarat
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Margesh Bharatbhai Thakkar

B.J. MEDICAL COLLEGE,CIVIL Hospital,Ahmedabad

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验