MedPath

Does Teaching Before or After Simulation Improve Learning?

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Simulation
Medical Education
Interventions
Other: Simulation on Pediatric Status Epilepticus
Other: Didactic Lecture on Pediatric Status Epilepticus
Registration Number
NCT06092320
Lead Sponsor
University of British Columbia
Brief Summary

The goal of the randomized educational intervention study is to test whether simulation preceding didactic teaching leads to improved knowledge and performance retention compared to a didactic lecture proceeding simulation for medical students

Participants will be randomized to one of two different groups with reverse orders for simulation and lectures.

Researchers will compare each group to see which way is better for learning.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Second year medical student at the University of British Columbia
Exclusion Criteria
  • None

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Didactic Lecture - Simulation GroupSimulation on Pediatric Status EpilepticusThis group will start with a didactic lecture and then complete a simulation and debrief. They will then complete a simulation 2 months later.
Simulation - Didactic Lecture GroupSimulation on Pediatric Status EpilepticusThis group will start with a Simulation and debrief followed by a didactic lecture afterwards. They will then complete a simulation 2 months later.
Simulation - Didactic Lecture GroupDidactic Lecture on Pediatric Status EpilepticusThis group will start with a Simulation and debrief followed by a didactic lecture afterwards. They will then complete a simulation 2 months later.
Didactic Lecture - Simulation GroupDidactic Lecture on Pediatric Status EpilepticusThis group will start with a didactic lecture and then complete a simulation and debrief. They will then complete a simulation 2 months later.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline in resuscitation performance retention score 2 months post-initial training assessed using global simulation performance scoreFrom initial simulation until repeat simulation 2 months later

The scoring sheet used will be the Global Simulation performance score a one to seven scale that assess over medical expertise performance in the simulation with higher values representing increased competence.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in knowledge assessment score at 2 months post-initial training assessed using an MCQFrom initial knowledge test until repeat testing 2 months later

The knowledge test is a 15 questions multiple choice exam scored from 0 to 15 with higher numbers representing a higher score.

Learner satisfaction measured by Likert scale items after each simulation debriefSingle time metric completed five minutes after initial simulation session

The Likert scale will be a one to five scale with higher scores representing increased satisfaction

Time to resuscitation metricsThe time for each metric will be measured once during the second evaluatory simulation 2 months after the initial simulation and participant enrolment.

The following "time to" metrics will be measured from simulation start until completion of each activity within that simulation: glucose check, IV access, first-line anti-epileptic administration, second-line anti-epileptic administration, chemistry panel

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

BC Children's Hospital

🇨🇦

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath