Comparison between Indwelling tunnelled catheter v/s Pig-tail catheter placement for management of Malignant Ascites
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: C15-C26- Malignant neoplasms of digestive organs
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/10/058312
- Lead Sponsor
- Basavatarakam IndoAmerican Cancer Hospital and Research Institute
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ECOG STATUS 3 OR LESS
-ALL PATIENTS WHO REQUIRE REPEATED TAPPINGS
Exclusion Criteria
-PATIENTS WITH LOCULATED ASCITES
-PATIENTS WHO REFUSED TO GIVE CONSENT
- Patients with deranged coagulation parameters (INR >2) or platelet counts less than 50000/mm3
- Actively dying terminally ill patient.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method -Ease of Drainage on Likert scale(1-5) <br/ ><br>-Pericatheter leak incidence comparsion in both catheter placements <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2ND DAY AFTER INTERVENTION <br/ ><br>7TH DAY AFTER INTERVENTIO
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method -Catheter dislodgement <br/ ><br>-Catheter site Infection rate between indwelling tunnelled catheter and pigtail catheter placement <br/ ><br>-Patient satisfaction after catheter placement on Likert scale(1-5) <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2ND DAY AFTER INTERVENTION <br/ ><br>7TH DAY AFTER INTERVENTIO