Remote Augmented Reality Versus Traditional In-person Resuscitation Assessment: an International Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 42
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Evaluation of Technical Skill (TS) and Non Technical Skill (NTS) Performance
研究概览
简要总结
This is a non-inferiority, international, controlled trial that aims to evaluate the progression of physicians and residents through an Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) clinical simulated scenario. The study's primary objective is to compare the performance outcomes between two groups: participants in the traditional in-person simulation and those immersed in the Augmented Reality (AR) scenario
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 99 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Brazilian resident
排除标准
- •a history of severe motion sickness
- •currently have nausea
- •a history of seizures
- •wear corrective glasses.
结局指标
主要结局
Evaluation of Technical Skill (TS) and Non Technical Skill (NTS) Performance
时间窗: immediately after simulation
Measured with Instrument for the evaluation of advanced life support performance. The instrument consists of 26 items, which are rated on a scale from +2 to -2. A total assessment score of performance is given based on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=poor, 10=excellent) at the end of the instrument.
次要结局
- Evaluation of the AR system's usability(immediately after simulation)
- Reassessment of Non Technical Skill (NTS) with Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)(immediately after simulation)
- Evaluation of the AR system's usability(immediately after simulation)
- Evaluation of the AR system's ergonomics(immediately after simulation)
研究者
Thomas Caruso
Clinical Professor
Stanford University