Remote Augmented Reality Versus Traditional In-person Resuscitation Assessment: an International Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Educational Problems
- Sponsor
- Stanford University
- Enrollment
- 42
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Evaluation of Technical Skill (TS) and Non Technical Skill (NTS) Performance
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 9 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This is a non-inferiority, international, controlled trial that aims to evaluate the progression of physicians and residents through an Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) clinical simulated scenario. The study's primary objective is to compare the performance outcomes between two groups: participants in the traditional in-person simulation and those immersed in the Augmented Reality (AR) scenario
Investigators
Thomas Caruso
Clinical Professor
Stanford University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Brazilian resident
Exclusion Criteria
- •a history of severe motion sickness
- •currently have nausea
- •a history of seizures
- •wear corrective glasses.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Evaluation of Technical Skill (TS) and Non Technical Skill (NTS) Performance
Time Frame: immediately after simulation
Measured with Instrument for the evaluation of advanced life support performance. The instrument consists of 26 items, which are rated on a scale from +2 to -2. A total assessment score of performance is given based on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=poor, 10=excellent) at the end of the instrument.
Secondary Outcomes
- Reassessment of Non Technical Skill (NTS) with Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)(immediately after simulation)
- Evaluation of the AR system's usability(immediately after simulation)
- Evaluation of the AR system's ergonomics(immediately after simulation)