A Randomized, Non-Blind, Clinical Effectiveness Trial in Post-Operative Pterional Craniotomy Drain Placement
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Pterional Craniotomy
- Sponsor
- University of Arizona
- Enrollment
- 90
- Primary Endpoint
- Pain Difference
- Last Updated
- 9 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This is a clinical trial where patients who present to the neurosurgery service in need of a procedure that requires a pterional craniotomy will be screened, and if eligible, enrolled for the randomization in the placement of a drain at the surgical site. At present, there is not a protocol for whether or not to use a drain following this procedure. There is some debate on whether it serves any real benefit for the patient or if it may actually be detrimental in cases where infection occurs. This study aims to answer this question by randomizing patients to drain placement and then comparing patient outcomes between the two groups. These include the following: infection rate, length of hospital stay, self-reported patient pain and discomfort, the amount of time before patients are able to open their eye ipsilateral to the side of operation, change in forehead circumference post-op days 1-3, and any unforeseen post-operative complications. This will be accomplished through using a patient-administered survey, recording physical measurements, and a patient chart review. Statistical analysis will then be used to identify any differences that may exist.
Investigators
Wyatt Ramey
Medical Doctor
University of Arizona
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients that have been scheduled for surgery requiring the use of a pterional craniotomy approach
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients in need of a surgical intervention requiring a pterional craniotomy due to reasons of physical injury
- •Patients who need a pterional craniotomy with a orbitozygomatic approach
- •Patients who have noticeable physical injury to their skull
- •Patients with a prior surgical history of a craniotomy
- •Patients with a pathological condition deemed severe enough by the screening physician to possibly influence the healing process of the procedure (blood clot disorder, cirrhosis, severe nutrient depletion, congestive heart failure etc.)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Pain Difference
Time Frame: At the time of discharge from the hospital but no longer than up to 16 weeks from the date of surgery.
Compare the reported pain/ discomfort between the patients who had drain placement from those who did not. This will be performed using a survey administered to patients upon removal of the drain
Complication Rate
Time Frame: From the date of surgery to the date of discharge from the hospital for up to 16 weeks following surgery, or until death, depending which comes first.
An overall assessment comparing complications between the two study groups will be performed. This will include looking things such as hospital acquired pneumonia, the development of any new neurological conditions or deficiencies, and other unforeseen complications that may arise which are not be directly related to the drain but may potentially still be influenced by it.
Surgical site infection rate
Time Frame: From the date of surgery to the date of discharge from the hospital for up to 16 weeks following surgery, or until death, depending which comes first.
Compare infections rates between patients with drains placement versus those who did not. Determine if there is any statistically significant difference in risk exists between the two study populations.
Difference in Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: From the date of surgery to the date of discharge from the hospital for up to 16 weeks following surgery, or until death, depending which comes first.
Compare the length of hospital between the treatment groups and determine whether a significant difference exists.
Head Circumference Difference
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 3 following surgery.
Compare the change in measured forehead circumference between treatment groups on post-operative days 1-3. Determine if a significant difference exists between the two.
Ability to open ipsilateral eye to surgical site.
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 3 following surgery.
Compare the number of subjects able to open and close their eye on the ipsilateral side of the surgical site between the study groups