A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis and Non-surgical Debridement With Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Peri-Implantitis
- Sponsor
- University of Geneva, Switzerland
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Resolution of the peri-implantitis
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical mechanical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application (test) in comparison with conventional surgical treatment and adjunctive systemic antibiotics (control), for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions, following an observation period of one year.
Detailed Description
Peri-implantitis is a major complication for dental implant patients, with its prevalence estimated in the order of 10% of implants and 20% of patients after 5 to 10 years of implant placement. When left untreated, peri-implantitis may cause progressive tissue destruction, esthetic complications and, eventually, implant loss. Despite numerous clinical trials and systematic reviews, studies have failed to identify a standardized protocol for the treatment of such conditions. Still, current literature and expert opinions recommend mechanical debridement of the implant followed by early evaluation and surgical intervention, implant decontamination using a wide variety of mechanical and chemical methods, then adjunctive systematic antibiotics. However, given the aggressive nature of surgical interventions, the inherent difficulty of decontaminating the implants' rough surfaces with conventional methods, in addition to the growing concerns over antibiotic resistance, the search for alternative approaches has become imperative. Since implant decontamination is the key aspect to resolution of peri-implantitis, different mechanical and chemical methods have been tested in that respect. In recent years, lasers have been attracting significant attention in this particular field. Diode lasers, in particular, have been shown to have potent bactericidal and photobiomodulatory effects promoting wound healing and tissue regeneration. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application in comparison with conventional surgical treatment with adjunctive systemic antibiotics for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions following an observation period of one year. The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical mechanical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application (test) in comparison with conventional surgical treatment and adjunctive systemic antibiotics (control), for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions, following an observation period of one year. 40 subjects will be randomly distributed into two parallel groups: 1. Test group (n= 20); receiving non-surgical mechanical debridement and adjunctive diode laser application at days 0, 7 and 14. 2. Control group (n= 20); receiving initial mechanical debridement at day 0, followed by open flap debridement and prescription of post-operative systemic antimicrobials at day 14.
Investigators
Dena Hashim
Principal investigator
University of Geneva, Switzerland
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
- •At least one solid screw-type titanium implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis; which is defined as at least one site with probing depth ≥5mm, bleeding on probing and/or suppuration, and radiographic evidence of crater-form bone loss ≥2 threads after insertion of the final prosthetic supra-structure.
- •Sound prosthetic supra-structure.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Contraindications to the class of drugs under study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to Amoxicillin and/or Metronidazole,
- •Systemic diseases that could compromise wound healing (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, cancer, HIV or bone metabolic disorders), radiation or immunosuppressive therapy,
- •Women who are pregnant or breast feeding,
- •Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse,
- •Heavy smokers consuming \>10 cigarettes/day,
- •Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
- •Participants not willing to attend regular dental maintenance visits and follow-up evaluations,
- •Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study,
- •Previous enrolment into the current study,
- •Active periodontal disease.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Resolution of the peri-implantitis
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as A absence of probing depths \> 4 mm, bleeding on probing or suppuration at the end of the observation period
Types and frequencies of adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months
Any adverse events related or unrelated to the treatment administered is recorded at the time and appropriate treatment is performed. The frequency, duration and intensity is also recorded.
Patient reported outcomes at 1 week
Time Frame: 1 week post-operatively
A visual analogue scale is used to evaluate post-operative discomfort and patient's perception of the administered treatment 1 week post-operatively.The scale measures a total of 100 mm ranging between 0-100; 0 indicating absence of pain and 100 being the worst pain imaginable.
Patient reported outcomes at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
A visual analogue scale is used to evaluate general patient's perception of the administered treatment 12 months post-operatively.The scale measures a total of 100 mm ranging between 0-100; 0 indicating lack of discomfort or pain and complete satisfaction and 100 being completely unsatisfied and/or with persisting pain or other symptoms.
Secondary Outcomes
- Differences between groups regarding changes in mean marginal bone level changes(12 months)
- Changes in probing depth(12 months)
- Change in marginal bone levels(12 months)
- Number of residual pockets > 4 mm(12 months)