Comparison of Facial Distortion Model and Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) Techniques After Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 33
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Power Track Manuel Muscle Tester
研究概览
简要总结
To compare the effects of facial distortion model and equipment assisted soft tissue mobilization techniques on the treatment process, which are among the applications in the rehabilitation process after meniscus repair.
详细描述
It is possible that pain, ROM, lower extremity flexibility and knee functions will be negatively affected after arthroscopic meniscus repair. This study searches and compares the effectiveness of fascial distortion model (FDM) and IASTM methods for these parameters that can be affected.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Cross Sectional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 55 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •The meniscus rupture and suspected magnetic resonance (MR) were diagnosed and operated by the surgeon during arthroscopy.
- •Those treated with the same surgical technique
- •Can walk independently before the operation
- •Can continue treatment for 4 weeks
- •Without chondral damage
- •Can continue treatment for 4 weeks
- •Those who have not had lower extremity surgery before
- •No fracture to prevent load transfer in the last 6 months
- •There is no full rupture of any ligament in the knee
- •Without knee instability
- •Those without abnormal changes in Q angle
- •According to Cooper classification, meniscus affected area is not in A and F regions.
- •Without protruded or extruded herniated disc
- •There is no contract in the directory
排除标准
- •Can not continue treatment for 4 weeks
结局指标
主要结局
Power Track Manuel Muscle Tester
时间窗: Change from postoperative 4. week at 8. week
In the manual muscle test, a hand dynamometer was developed for the standardization of the given resistance, which determines the resistance given by the tester. This tool objectively shows the amount of force used in muscle testing. The tool is placed proximal to the tibia, the amount of force applied is read from the manometer on the dorsal side of the hand. It is placed on the front for extension and on the back for flexion.
Goniometric measurement
时间窗: Change from postoperative 4. week at 8. week
uses a goniometer to measure the hamstring flexibility during a passive straight leg lift.
The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET )
时间窗: Change from postoperative 4. week at 8. week
In this inventory, there are 16 items that represent physical domains (nine items), sports / entertainment / work / lifestyle (four items) and the domains of emotions (three items). A value between 0-10 is requested in each item. The score of each subgroup is obtained by dividing the marked values of the questions of that section by the number of questions and multiplying by 10. The total score is obtained by summing all scores and dividing by 16 and multiplying by 10.
environmental measurement
时间窗: Change from postoperative 4. week at 8. week
One of the anthropometric measurement techniques is measured using tape measure. Medial tibial plateau and 5 cm intervals at 5 cm, 10 cm and 15 cm points are marked and the circumference of the knee and the leg is measured.
Visual Analog Scale
时间窗: Change from postoperative 4. week at 8. week
It is used to convert some values that cannot be measured numerically into numerical values. Two end definitions of the parameter to be evaluated on both ends of a 100 mm line are written and the patient is asked to indicate where his / her condition is appropriate on this line by drawing a line or by marking or pointing.
sit and reach test
时间窗: Change from postoperative 4. week at 8. week
To reach the farthest in a sitting position.
Lysholm Knee Score
时间窗: Change from postoperative 4. week at 8. week
It is a scoring questioning situations such as pain, stair climbing, squatting, walking pattern and swelling of the knee while showing certain activities. In the Lysholm scoring system; It can be classified as 0-20 bad, 21-40 medium, 41-60 medium-good, 61-80 good, 81-100 perfect.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Bahar Anaforoglu Külünkoglu
Assoc. Prof.
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University