Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03678532
NCT03678532
Completed
Not Applicable

Effects of Sedation on Clinical, Gasometric and Respiratory Muscle Parameters in Critically Ill COPD Patients

Assiut University0 sites97 target enrollmentJuly 1, 2016

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Midazolam
Conditions
Sedation in Critically Ill COPD Patients
Sponsor
Assiut University
Enrollment
97
Primary Endpoint
ventilation affection
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

the investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial in respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Assiut University Hospital. COPD patients admitted to RICU were included. Exclusion criteria include: Marked renal impairment, Liver cell failure, neurological disorders, age <18 or >70 and pregnancy.

Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Midazolam was used for sedation in both groups. Richmond agitation-sedation score (RASS) was used to monitor level of sedation or agitation. Control group received daily interruption of sedation. intervention group managed by no-sedation strategy.

Primary outcome measure: changes in PaCO2 Secondary outcome measures include: changes in PH, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, P0.1 and NIF.

Detailed Description

The researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial in respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Assiut University Hospital. COPD patients admitted to RICU were included. Exclusion Criteria include: Marked renal impairment (creatinine \> 2mg/dl), Liver cell failure (Bilirubin\> 3mg/dl), neurological disorders, age \<18 or \>70 and pregnancy. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Midazolam was used for sedation in both groups. Richmond agitation-sedation score (RASS) was used to monitor level of sedation or agitation. Control group received daily interruption of sedation. After intubation, patients received IV infusion of midazolam, gradually increasing dose till RASS reached -4 or -5. Infusion stopped at 7:00 AM. If the patient is awake no need for resuming infusion. If signs of discomfort occurred, infusion resumed at half of the prior dose, targeting conscious sedation (RASS 0: -3) Intervention group were managed by no-sedation strategy. Patients received bolus doses of midazolam only when needed, after atrial to control agitation by correcting the underlying cause. If the patient needed more than 3 bolus doses , IV infusion of midazolam was given by the daily interruption protocol as in the control group. No crossover was allowed between groups. Analysis was done by intension-to-treat principle. Follow up arterial blood gas sampling was done baseline at intubation. 1hr., 2hrs., 12hrs., 24hrs. and 48hrs. after intubation. Recording of clinical monitoring parameters (hear rate, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate) was done at the same intervals. Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) and negative inspiratory force (NIF) were measured 48 hours after intubation to test affection of respiratory muscles in both groups. Primary outcome measure: changes in PaCO2 Secondary outcome measures include: changes in PH, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, P0.1 and NIF.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 1, 2016
End Date
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Emad Zarief , MD

Associate Professor of Anesthesia

Assiut University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Critically ill patients diagnosed as COPD, admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Assiut University Hospital.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Marked renal impairment (creatinine \> 2mg/dl), Liver cell failure (Bilirubin\> 3mg/dl), neurological disorders, age \<18 or \>70 and pregnancy.

Arms & Interventions

Daily interruption of sedation (control group)

Control group received daily interruption of sedation. After intubation, patients received IV infusion of midazolam. 1-2 mg / hour with increments 1-2 mg/hr gradually increasing dose till RASS reached -4 or -5. Infusion stopped at 7:00 AM. If the patient is awake no need for resuming infusion. If signs of discomfort occurred, infusion resumed at half of the prior dose, targeting conscious sedation (RASS 0: -3)

Intervention: Midazolam

No sedation

Intervention group were managed by no-sedation strategy. Patients received bolus doses of midazolam (1-5 mg) only when needed, after atrial to control agitation by correcting the underlying cause. If the patient needed more than 3 bolus doses , IV infusion of midazolam was given by the daily interruption protocol as in the control group. No crossover was allowed between groups. Analysis was done by intension-to-treat principle.

Intervention: Midazolam

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

ventilation affection

Time Frame: 48 hours

changes in PaCO2 measured in mmHG

Secondary Outcomes

  • Effect of sedation on heart rate(48 hours)
  • effect of sedation on acid base status(48 hours)
  • Effect of sedation on blood pressure(48 hours)

Similar Trials