Comparison of Two Neuromuscular Monitors
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Neuromuscular Monitoring
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Caen
- Enrollment
- 17
- Primary Endpoint
- Time to recover T4/T1 > 90%
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 11 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Different neuromuscular monitors may be available in the same care structure. Two different monitors are available in the investigators' institution in the operative room and the recovery room. However, these two monitors have not been compared and may not be interchangeable. Starting the monitoring with one device and continuing with another device may be inaccurate and may lead to inadequate medical decisions. The investigators therefore conducted this observational study to compare the two devices available in our institution.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients undergoing vascular surgery under general anesthesia and requiring neuromuscular blockade for intubation or surgery
Exclusion Criteria
- •Pregnancy or feeding
- •Any pathology or medication that may impair neuromuscular conduction or muscular response of the ulnar nerve stimulation
- •American Society of Anesthesiology \[4\] physical status
- •Allergy or contraindication of neuromuscular blocking agents
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Time to recover T4/T1 > 90%
Time Frame: Time between muscle relaxant injection and: intubation; recovery of 4 responses on the train of four (TOF); recovery of T4/T1 >40%; recovery of T4/T1>90% average 2 hours
After muscle relaxant injection, we measure the time needed for the muscular response to disappear and to completely recover during the operation (which takes in average 2 hours).