MedPath

Study: Tea(m)Time - Strengthening the Team Resilience of Hospital Staff Through the Tea(m)Time Intervention

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Resilience, Psychological
Personnel, Hospital
Registration Number
NCT06694584
Lead Sponsor
Catholic University of Applied Sciences Mainz
Brief Summary

Employees in hospitals are exposed to various stressors and can be at risk of psychological stress. To counteract this, resilience programs are increasingly being offered. Most interventions focus on individual resilience. In this study, the focus is on the resilience of teams. For this reason, this research paper will focus on the Tea(m)Time intervention. Tea(m)Time is a health promotion intervention that combines the risk assessment of mental stress with a focus on team resilience. In order to generate knowledge about the Tea(m)Time intervention, this study aims to identify factors that promote and inhibit its implementation and mediate its effectiveness. The aim is to gain insights into the promotion of resilience in teams. The aim is to conduct the survey of the participants in the intervention group and the control group at three different points in time.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
FITOR questionnaire (questionnaire on individual, team and organizational resilience)t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up

Schulte, E.M. et al. (2021)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ-G) German version of the Organizational Commitment Questionairet0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up

Maier, G.W. \& Woschée, R. (2014) individual items were used

Psychological empowermentt0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up

Schermuly, C.C. (2019)

Instrument to Measure the Culture for Psychological Empowerment in Organizations (IMPEC)t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up

Schermuly, C.C. et al. (2022)

Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (AITCS-II)t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up

Orchard C. (2015) individual items were used

Big-Five-Inventory-10 (BFI-10)t0 baseline

Rammstedt, B. et al. (2012)

The questionnaire to record the willingness to change (FEVER)t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up

Hasler, G. et al. (2003). Testing of the German version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA) individual items used and adapted

German standard version of the COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire)t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up

FFAW (2023) individual items were used

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Klinik Viktoriastift Bad Kreuznach

🇩🇪

Bad Kreuznach, Germany

Geriatrische Fachklinik Rheinhessen-Nahe

🇩🇪

Bad Kreuznach, Germany

Gesundheitszentrum Glantal

🇩🇪

Meisenheim, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath