MedPath

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Antimicrobial Agents Administered by Subcutaneous Route in Patients AGEd Over 65 Years

Conditions
Antibiotic
Antimicrobials
Subcutaneous Injection
Older People
Interventions
Drug: Subcutaneous (SC) route for antibiotic treatment
Drug: Intravenous (IV) route for antibiotic treatment
Registration Number
NCT03583749
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Brief Summary

Elderly people are more prone to develop infection with a poorer prognosis compared to young people. Physicians may encounter difficulties regarding antimicrobial agents administration route. In fact, poor venous access and behavioral disturbance are frequent issues. The subcutaneous (SC) route may be a safe alternative, but sparse data are available in the literature. The present study aims to describe Pharmacokinetics (PK) / Pharmacodynamics (PD) characteristics of antibiotics (amoxicillin/clavulanate, ceftriaxone and piperacillin/tazobactam) subcutaneous administration in patients aged over 65.

Detailed Description

Antibiotic administration through subcutaneous (SC) injection is common practice in France, especially in Geriatrics as an alternative to intravenous (IV) route in case of poor venous access or delirium (Forestier et al. CMI 2015). Whereas tolerance of such a practice seems to be reasonable (Roubaud-Baudron et al. Age and Ageing 2017), sparse PK/PD data are available. Most PK/PD studies include young and healthy subjects, yet elderly patients often have multimorbidity , poly medication, renal insufficiency and cachexia which may disturb antibiotics PK/PD. Compared to intravenous (IV) route, SC route is less painful and less frequently associated with infectious or thrombotic complication. A recent study carried out in Bordeaux University Hospital comparing PK/PD data on ertapenem SC or IV administrations in patients aged over 75 showed that area under the curve (AUC) and probability to maintain free ertapenem concentration above the Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) during at least 40% of time (fT\>MIC\>40%) were not significantly different (manuscript in progress).

The investigator's hypothesis is that SC administration of amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam has favorable pharmacokinetics and acceptable tolerance compared with IV infusion in elderly patients.

Patients receiving one of the three antibiotics by IV or SC route will be included at steady state (depending on antibiotic treatment) for several blood tests (3 or 4 depending of routes choice) and followed until 15 days after completion of antibiotic treatment in order to evaluate tolerance and efficacy of antibiotic treatment. Physicians in charge of patients will decide antibiotic prescription including administration route. The study will not influence these choices because patients will be included after antibiotic initiation.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria
  • Aged over 65
  • To receive ceftriaxone (1g daily) or amoxicillin-clavulanate (1g/0.2g every 8h) or piperacillin-tazobactam (4g/0.5g every 8h) by SC or IV infusion (30-60minutes) at steady state (48h, 24h and 24h respectively)
  • Free, written and informed consent signed by the participant or by a proxy in case of delirium
Exclusion Criteria
  • criteria for legislation (justice protection, subject participating to another research including a period of exclusion)
  • previous inclusion in this study

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
piperacillin-tazobactamIntravenous (IV) route for antibiotic treatmentfollowed of SC and IV cohort without any randomization because the route will be chosen before inclusion by the physician in charge.
ceftriaxoneSubcutaneous (SC) route for antibiotic treatmentfollowed of SC and IV cohort without any randomization because the route will be chosen before inclusion by the physician in charge.
amoxicillin-clavulanateIntravenous (IV) route for antibiotic treatmentfollowed of SC and IV cohort without any randomization because the route will be chosen before inclusion by the physician in charge.
ceftriaxoneIntravenous (IV) route for antibiotic treatmentfollowed of SC and IV cohort without any randomization because the route will be chosen before inclusion by the physician in charge.
amoxicillin-clavulanateSubcutaneous (SC) route for antibiotic treatmentfollowed of SC and IV cohort without any randomization because the route will be chosen before inclusion by the physician in charge.
piperacillin-tazobactamSubcutaneous (SC) route for antibiotic treatmentfollowed of SC and IV cohort without any randomization because the route will be chosen before inclusion by the physician in charge.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Plasma antibiotic concentrationsDay 1

Describe and compare pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam administered by SC and IV routes

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of infection cureDay 21

rate of infection cure at the end of antibiotic treatment up to 15 days after the end of antibiotic therapy

Number of hospitalisation daysDay 21

Describe the times of hospitalisation

Number of adverse eventsDay 21

Occurrence of adverse events (AEs) up to 15 days after the end of local antibiotherapy (edema, pain, erythema, necrosis) and systemic (AEs described in the Summary of Product Characteristics for antibiotics)

Trial Locations

Locations (5)

University Hospital, Poitiers

🇫🇷

Poitiers, France

Hospices Civils de Lyon

🇫🇷

Lyon, France

CHU de Bordeaux

🇫🇷

Bordeaux, France

Hospital Métropole Savoie

🇫🇷

Chambéry, France

CHU de Grenoble Alpes

🇫🇷

Grenoble, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath