跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2021/09/036284
CTRI/2021/09/036284尚未招募不适用

Comparison of supraglottic airway devices: I-Gel versus Proseal laryngeal mask airway in elective laproscopic gynecological procedures.

DrBhavana1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2021年9月16日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Ease of device insertion , number of insertion attempts and airway leak pressure between the LMAs are compared

研究概览

简要总结

the study assess the ease of securing airway and airway leak pressures between the two LMA i.e I-Gel and Proseal .

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Not Applicable

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
Female

入选标准

  • ASA 1 AND 2 patients with mallampati 1 and 2.

排除标准

  • patients with anticipated difficult airway h/o increased risk of regurgitation of gastric contents like full stomach , pregnancy, trauma , oesophageal motility disorders, intestinal obstruction.

结局指标

主要结局

Ease of device insertion , number of insertion attempts and airway leak pressure between the LMAs are compared

时间窗: intraoperative monitoring from the beginning of surgery i.e LMA insertion to end of surgeryi.e reversal and removal of LMA

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
DrBhavana
申办方类型
Other [self]

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验