MedPath

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Standard Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With High Risk Factors for Failure

Completed
Conditions
Rectal Cancer
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04679597
Lead Sponsor
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
Brief Summary

In a retrospective study, the investigators will compare patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with high risk factors for failure who were treated with standard therapy or with total neoadjuvant therapy.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
161
Inclusion Criteria
  • histologically proven locally advanced rectal cancer and
  • the presence of one of the factors: T4, N2, positive mesorectal fascia, presence of extramural vascular invasion or presence of lateral lymph node.
Exclusion Criteria
  • distant metastases,
  • concomitant malignancy,
  • inflammatory bowel disease, or
  • malabsorption syndrome.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
standard therapyCapecitabineStandard therapy (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy)
total neoadjuvant therapyCapecitabineTotal neoadjuvant therapy consisted of 12 weeks of induction chemotherapy with CAPOX or FOLFOX, chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and six to eight weeks of consolidation chemotherapy with CAPOX or FOLFOX prior to surgery.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
pathological complete responseduring surgery

pathological complete response is defined as the absence of tumor cells in the surgical resection

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Neoadjuvant rectal cancer scoreduring treatment, assessed up to 10 days

Neoadjuvant rectal cancer score: The NAR score was calculated using the equation \[5 pN - 3(cT - pT) + 12\]\^2 / 9.61 and further classified as low (\< 8), intermediate (8-16), or high (\< 16).

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath