Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Standard Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With High Risk Factors for Failure
- Registration Number
- NCT04679597
- Lead Sponsor
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
- Brief Summary
In a retrospective study, the investigators will compare patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with high risk factors for failure who were treated with standard therapy or with total neoadjuvant therapy.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 161
- histologically proven locally advanced rectal cancer and
- the presence of one of the factors: T4, N2, positive mesorectal fascia, presence of extramural vascular invasion or presence of lateral lymph node.
- distant metastases,
- concomitant malignancy,
- inflammatory bowel disease, or
- malabsorption syndrome.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description standard therapy Capecitabine Standard therapy (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy) total neoadjuvant therapy Capecitabine Total neoadjuvant therapy consisted of 12 weeks of induction chemotherapy with CAPOX or FOLFOX, chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and six to eight weeks of consolidation chemotherapy with CAPOX or FOLFOX prior to surgery.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method pathological complete response during surgery pathological complete response is defined as the absence of tumor cells in the surgical resection
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Neoadjuvant rectal cancer score during treatment, assessed up to 10 days Neoadjuvant rectal cancer score: The NAR score was calculated using the equation \[5 pN - 3(cT - pT) + 12\]\^2 / 9.61 and further classified as low (\< 8), intermediate (8-16), or high (\< 16).