MedPath

Gastrointestinal Dysmotility on Aspiration Risk

Phase 4
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Esophageal Motility Disorders
Gastric Motor Dysfunction
Gastro Esophageal Reflux
Aspiration Pneumonia
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT05455359
Lead Sponsor
Boston Children's Hospital
Brief Summary

The hypothesis of this study is that esophageal and gastric dysmotility increase the risk of developing aspiration-associated symptoms in children with neurologic impairment. The investigators are conducting a ten week cross over study comparing prucalopride to famotidine for the treatment of aspiration-associated symptoms.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  1. are 5-21 years of age;

  2. receive >90% of their calories by enteral tube (i.e., patients take no food or drink by mouth);

  3. are determined to be at high risk for aspiration pneumonia based on evidence of impaired airway protective mechanisms, documented by aspiration on video fluoroscopic swallow study;

  4. have static neurologic impairment, defined as functional and/or intellectual impairment that results from a chronic neurologic or related diagnosis (e.g., cerebral palsy) with no prospect of progression for at least one year;

  5. have chronic respiratory symptoms, defined as coughing, choking, or need for oral suctioning a minimum of three times per week during the prior four weeks.

Exclusion Criteria
  1. have progressive neurologic impairment;
  2. have a history of prior intact Nissen fundoplication;
  3. are currently taking oral or inhaled antibiotics, including prophylactic antibiotics;
  4. are currently taking or have taken in the last four weeks acid suppression (H2 antagonist or PPI); or
  5. are fed by gastrojejunostomy rather than by gastrostomy. -

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Arm 1PrucalopridePatients will be undergo 1 week observation period followed by 4 weeks of prucalopride followed by 1 weeks of a wash out followed by 4 weeks of famotidine
Arm 1FamotidinePatients will be undergo 1 week observation period followed by 4 weeks of prucalopride followed by 1 weeks of a wash out followed by 4 weeks of famotidine
Arm 2PrucalopridePatients will be undergo 1 week observation period followed by 4 weeks of famotidine followed by 1 weeks of a wash out followed by 4 weeks of prucalopride
Arm 2FamotidinePatients will be undergo 1 week observation period followed by 4 weeks of famotidine followed by 1 weeks of a wash out followed by 4 weeks of prucalopride
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pediatric Cough Quality of Life Questionnaire4 weeks

Comparison of the mean difference in the Pediatric Cough Quality of Life Questionnaire (range: 7 to 189, lower scores=more symptom impairment) between baseline and 4 week scores between Arm 1 and Arm 2

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Gastric emptying outcomes4 weeks

Comparison of within-patient differences in gastric residuals by nuclear scintigraphy

Aspiration symptoms4 weeks

Comparison of the mean difference in the number of coughing or choking episodes per week during the fourth week of treatment

Microbiome8 weeks

Comparison of within-patient differences in microbiome diversity and abundance between baseline and after each medication period

Pneumonias10 weeks

Comparisons in the number of aspiration pneumonias between each treatment period

Total Peds-GI QL score8 weeks

Comparison of the mean difference in total Peds-GI QL scores (range: 0-100, lower=worse symptoms) between famotidine and prucalopride periods

Esophageal reflux events4 weeks

Comparison of within-patient differences in post-prandial reflux events by nuclear scintigraphy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath