Adenosine Contrast CorrELations in Evaluating RevAscularizaTION
- Conditions
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03557385
- Lead Sponsor
- Duke University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare FFR measurements done with adenosine to FFR measurements done with contrast, where the contrast is injected using the ACIST CVi automated contrast injector.
The ACCELERATION study will support a safer approach to FFR for patients by potentially reducing toxic drug exposure (adenosine). The 2 main objectives of the study are:
1. Perform a methods comparison between cFFR and the reference standard aFFR, where cFFR is performed using an automated injector with a standardized volume and rate of delivery of contrast with known osmolality.
2. Evaluate the association between final post-PCI FFR and long-term clinical outcomes. The long-term clinical outcomes will include TVR and composite MACE (death, MI, and TVR) at 30 days and 1 year.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 201
- Have the capacity to understand and sign an informed consent or have a legally authorized representative (LAR) that can understand and sign an informed consent prior to initial arteriotomy access
- Age > 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent
- Clinically stable and undergoing non-emergent cardiac catheterization for appropriate indications
- Willing to be contacted by telephone at 30 days (if no standard of care visit) and at 1 year with chart review for events.
- Target vessel with an intermediate lesion of 40-70% stenosis by angiographic assessment (a visual estimation by the operator). Serial lesions, diffuse disease, or ostial lesions ("all-comer" lesions) are acceptable if the operator would normally perform FFR and proceed with PCI (or other revascularization) if positive.
- Any condition associated with a life expectancy of less than 1 year
- Participation in another clinical study using an investigational agent or device within the past 3 months
- Ejection fraction ≤ 35%
- Creatinine ≥ 2
- Severe valvular heart disease
- Decompensated acute diastolic or systolic heart failure
- Bronchospastic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other intolerance to adenosine
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction culprit lesion or lesions with any thrombus burden after diagnostic angiography
- Lesions with severe calcification after diagnostic angiography
- Lesions in a target vessel supplied by a patent graft
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description aFFR vs cFFR adenosine All subjects will receive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements with both adenosine (aFFR) and contrast (Iopamidol) (cFFR) using the Navvus® Catheter and CVi® Contrast Delivery System aFFR vs cFFR Navvus® Catheter All subjects will receive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements with both adenosine (aFFR) and contrast (Iopamidol) (cFFR) using the Navvus® Catheter and CVi® Contrast Delivery System aFFR vs cFFR CVi® Contrast Delivery System All subjects will receive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements with both adenosine (aFFR) and contrast (Iopamidol) (cFFR) using the Navvus® Catheter and CVi® Contrast Delivery System aFFR vs cFFR Iopamidol All subjects will receive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements with both adenosine (aFFR) and contrast (Iopamidol) (cFFR) using the Navvus® Catheter and CVi® Contrast Delivery System
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison Between Contrast Fractional Flow Reserves (cFFR) and Adenosine Fractional Flow Reserves (aFFR) Baseline FFR is the ratio between the maximal myocardial flow measured in a diseased coronary artery and the theoretical maximal blood flow in the same territory in the absence of the stenosis, measured using adenosine induced hyperemia (aFFR) or contrast induced hyperemia (cFFR). Contrast FFR is being compared to the gold-standard adenosine FFR. An aFFR equal or less than 0.80 is the gold-standard cut-off to benefit from intervention. Reported as the percentage of agreement between aFFR and cFFR.
Qualitative Method Comparison Between Contrast Fractional Flow Reserves and Adenosine Fractional Flow Reserves Baseline The qualitative method comparison assesses the agreement as to which lesion is flow limiting. The contrast FFR measurement that corresponds to adenosine FFR measurement value of 0.8 will be used as the cutoff value for determining whether a lesion is flow limiting for contrast FFR. Reported as the percentage of agreement between aFFR and cFFR.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Long-term Clinical Outcomes: Composite Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE: Death, MI, and TVR) 1 year post procedure (MACE: death, MI, and TVR) TVR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel including the target lesion.
An MI is caused by decreased or complete cessation of blood flow to a portion of the myocardium.
Trial Locations
- Locations (5)
Long Beach VA
🇺🇸Long Beach, California, United States
Mercy Hospital
🇺🇸Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States
Durham VA
🇺🇸Durham, North Carolina, United States
Vanderbilt
🇺🇸Nashville, Tennessee, United States
University of Minnesota
🇺🇸Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States