MedPath

Performance and Acceptance of Optive Versus Hylocomod Eyedrops in Patients With Dry Eye Symptoms

Registration Number
NCT00761202
Lead Sponsor
Allergan
Brief Summary

This study evaluates the performance and acceptance of Optive versus Hylocomod eyedrops, when administered for one month to patients with mild to moderate dry eye symptoms, with and without contact lenses.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years or over
  • Contact lens wearer, spectacle wearer or non-spectacle wearer
  • Mild to severe dry eye symptoms, defined as OSDI score 13 to 100
  • Mild to moderate conjunctival staining in each eye and/or mild to moderate corneal staining in each eye
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 6/9 in each eye
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previously used Hylocomod or Optive eyedrops
  • Systemic allergy or eye allergy
  • Systemic disease which might have an ocular component and/or interfere with contact lens wear
  • Autoimmune disease which might have an ocular component and/or interfere with contact lens wear
  • Systemic medication which might have eye side effects and or interfere with contact lens wear
  • Eye infection or use of eye medication

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1A sterile solution containing sodium carboxymethylcellulose and glycerin, preserved with PURITE®Optive Eyedrops
2Sodium hyaluronateHylocomod Eyedrops
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Conjunctival Staining by Lissamine Greenweek 1, month 1

Percentage of cases of limbal staining by lissamine green at each point on a five point scale (0 = None, 1 = Trace, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Severe)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Corneal Staining by Fluoresceinweek 1, month 1

Percentage of cases of limbal staining by sodium fluorescein at each point on a five point scale (0 = None, 1 = Trace, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Severe)

Conjunctival Hyperaemiaweek 1, month 1

Percentage of conjunctival response reported in terms of limbal hyperaemia for the worst responses over the area at each point on a five point scale (0=clear/white conjunctiva, 1=slight redness, 2=Mild redness, 3=Moderate redness, 4=Severe redness)

Ocular Comfort and Ocular Symptoms on Visual Analogue Scaleweek 1, month 1

Mean comfort judged on a 100 point visual analogue scale (0=Very Poor, 100=Excellent)

Daily Eyedrop UsageMonth 1

Average daily eyedrop use

Lipid Layer Pattern AssessmentWeek 1, month 1

Lipid layer thickness as determined by lipid layer mixing pattern. A high mixing pattern = thick lipid layer.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath