3D Tissue Engineered Bone Equivalent for Treatment of Traumatic Bone Defects
- Conditions
- Bone Defects
- Interventions
- Biological: 3D-Tissue Engineered Bone Equivalent
- Registration Number
- NCT03103295
- Lead Sponsor
- A.A. Partners, LLC
- Brief Summary
This study investigates safety and efficacy of traumatic bone defects treatment with use of 3D tissue engineered bone equivalent (3D-TEBE).
The aim of this study is to evaluate 3D-TEBE transplantation as a safe and efficient treatment for patients with traumatic long bone defects of critical size.
- Detailed Description
This new method of critical sized long bone defects treatment is under clinical development. Treatment of critical sized bone defects is an actual clinical challenge. The "gold standard" in this case is autologous bone grafting. The method disadvantage is associated with limited donor bone resources. Based on our preliminary clinical trial positive results on use of autologous cultured bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) in traumatology, our aim was to develop 3D tissue-engineered bone equivalent transplantation technology for restoration of critical sized bone defects. The proposed 3D-TEBE transplantation for bone defects of critical size treatment expecting to restore the bone integrity, form new bone tissue in a site of bone defect, and reduce the rehabilitation period of a patient.
The data obtained from this study will have practical implications for the treatment of reparative osteogenesis alterations and will be based on the principles of evidence-based medicine
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Age 18 to 60 years
- Patients with long bone defects of critical size of the traumatic genesis;
- Lack of consolidation of bone fragments for at least 9 months;
- At least two attempts to achieve bone consolidation using traditional methods of treatment;
- A negative pregnancy test at women of childbearing age;
- Confirmation of participation in the study by signing The Written Informed Consent, personally or through a responsible caretaker;
- The infection in the area of bone defect;
- History of prior cancer;
- Diabetes;
- Severe chronic liver diseases or kidneys disease in history
- Pregnancy;
- The presence of vascular, endocrine and somatic pathology which has a direct impact on the osteoreparation;
- Any other physical diseases in decompensation or subcompensation, or those that are rated as severe or moderate;
- Therapeutic issues or psychiatric disorders of a patient which would make the subject unsuitable to participate in this study or to complete it;
- Participation in another clinical trial.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 3D-Tissue Engineered Bone Equivalent 3D-Tissue Engineered Bone Equivalent Patients with bone defects of critical size of long bones 3D Tissue Engineered Bone Equivalent: allogeneic or xenogeneic partially demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and plasma-derived fibrin gel seeded with autologous cultured bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs), periosteal progenitor cells (PPCs), peripheral blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells (PB-EPCs).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Radiographic and MRI assessment in progression 12 months +3 years following 3D Tissue Engineered Bone Equivalent grafting Radiological and MRI progression of consolidation of bone fragments
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Reduction of pain using VAS 6 months Patients feel less pain during use of fractured limb
Cost analysis based on length of hospital stay 6 months Cost benefit of 3D-TEBE transplantation by reduction of hospital admission time
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY "A.A. PARTNERS" (Medical company ilaya®)
🇺🇦Kiev, Ukraine