Comparative analysis of the effectiveness and security of the blockade Erectus Spinae Plane Lumbar (ESP-L) versus the absence of locoregional block in hip surgery

Phase 1

Conditions: Hip fracture
Therapeutic area: Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Anesthesia and Analgesia [E03]

Registration Number: CTIS2024-511528-15-00

Lead Sponsor: Asociacion Gallega De Anestesiologia Reanimacion Y Dolor

Brief Summary: Not available

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: ot Recruiting

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 170

Inclusion Criteria

Patients undergoing hip surgery. - Patients over 18 years of age. - Both genders. -ASA I-III. Classification system used by the American Society of Anesthesiologists where I is low anesthetic risk and IV is high risk . - Understanding the principles of pain assessment using a visual scale analogue EVA - Signature of consent

Exclusion Criteria

- Patients with contraindications for performing the technique - Technical inability to perform either of the two blocks described - Significant cognitive impairment or previous mental disability described in history clinic - Patients included in another clinical trial

Study & Design

Study Type: Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product

Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Main Objective: Compare the analgesic efficacy of lumbar ESP block versus no block locoregional in patients undergoing hip and proximal femur surgery through the VAS scale with pain reduction of at least 1 point after two hours postoperative.;Secondary Objective: - Compare the postoperative analgesic needs after performing the ESP-L block versus the control group of patients undergoing hip or proximal femur surgery. - Compare postoperative opioid consumption in the two groups. - Assess and compare the technical ease of the intervention (ESP-L block) - Compare the side effects in the two lines of treatment - Assess the level of patient satisfaction.;Primary end point(s): To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of lumbar ESP block versus the absence of blockade in the postoperative period of hip and proximal femur surgery through the VAS scale with pain reduction of at least 1 point after two hours postoperative.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Secondary end point(s):- Compare postoperative analgesic needs after performing the block ESP-L versus control group of patients undergoing hip or femur surgery proximal - Compare postoperative opioid consumption in the two groups. - Assess and compare the technical ease of the intervention (ESP-L block) - Compare the side effects in the two lines of treatment - Assess the level of patient satisfaction