Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05047237
NCT05047237
Completed
Not Applicable

eFIcacious-Diabetes Care: a Pilot Study of a Pharmacist-Led Optimization Intervention to Achieve Guideline-based Care for Frail Older Adults

Wake Forest University Health Sciences1 site in 1 country42 target enrollmentOctober 29, 2021

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Diabetes
Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Enrollment
42
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in HbA1c
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to explore whether a pharmacist-led diabetes management program can help optimize diabetes care for older adults. Participation in this study will involve meeting with a pharmacist who works with subjects' doctors, getting some routine bloodwork typical for people with diabetes, and potentially adjusting the subject's diabetes medications to reach American Diabetes Association guidelines. This study aims to bring older adults with diabetes whose measurements and medications are different from the guidelines of the American Diabetes Association into guidelines-based ranges.

Detailed Description

This study is a pragmatic pilot study assessing the feasibility and acceptability, and preliminary impact of a pharmacist-led care pathway to align patient care with guidelines for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management in frail older adults, leveraging existing resources and pathways of care led by Clinical Prescribing Pharmacists. Eligible participants will be identified from the Electronic Health Record (EHR). Research staff will then approach the primary care physicians for identified patients to confirm that patients are appropriate for the intervention, as determined by the primary care physician (PCP). Patients will then be contacted both by letter and phone call, and invited to participate in the pharmacist-led pathway. Telephonic informed consent will be obtained. Outcomes for all participants will be accessed passively via the EHR. The study team hypothesizes that patients who go through the pharmacist-led primary care intervention will be more likely to have guideline-concordant medical therapy as compared with an EHR-based control group. Also, the study team believes that the intervention will reach at least 50% of those referred by their physicians to participate, the median number of outpatient visits will be three or less, and that the intervention will require a total of \<3 hours for pharmacists and patients across the 3-month intervention period. In addition, the study team expects patients, physicians, and pharmacists will report the intervention is feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and high-value. Lastly, the study team believes that the intervention group will have a lower mortality than the comparison group.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 29, 2021
End Date
May 31, 2025
Last Updated
10 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Attributed to a Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist-affiliated Accountable Care Organization
  • At least 2 consecutive International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for type two diabetes mellitus in the prior 2 years
  • Has a calculable Electronic Frailty Index (eFI) score \>0.21
  • A glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value \<7.5% in the prior 2 years
  • Currently taking a sulfonylurea or insulin for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Moderate to severe hearing loss (due to phone interventions)
  • Diagnosed Alzheimer's disease or related dementia (unable to participate)
  • Non-English speaking (not all pharmacists speak a second language; subtleties may not be conveyed effectively)
  • No phone number available for patient (follow up contacts will be by telehealth or phone

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in HbA1c

Time Frame: From Baseline through Month 6

Random Glucose Measurements

Time Frame: From Baseline through Month 12

The study team will track any glucose measurements obtained between initial enrollment and 6-12 months follow up after completion of the intervention, up until a total of 12 months after initial enrollment. This will be reported as a glucose trajectory.

Feasibility Measures: Effort Required to Enroll-Average Call Duration

Time Frame: Month 6

Duration of calls to enroll in minutes.

Estimated Change in Out-of-Pocket Costs

Time Frame: From Baseline through Month 6

Change in diabetes medication cost

Point estimates of Feasibility Measures: Participation/Reach

Time Frame: Month 6

The proportion of those referred who chose to participate

Point estimates of Feasibility Measure-Number of Visits

Time Frame: Month 12

Mean and median number of visits with the pharmacist before glucose levels are met.

Proportion of subjects who Achieve Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) values

Time Frame: Month 6

Proportion of subjects who achieve target value of HbA1c \>7.5%

Point estimates of Feasibility Measures: Number Contacted/Reach

Time Frame: Month 6

Total number of subjects contacted

Point estimates of Feasibility Measures: Number at Risk/Reach

Time Frame: Month 6

Total number of patients who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria at each site

Feasibility Measures: Effort Required to Enroll-Number Calls

Time Frame: Month 6

Number of calls to enroll

Point estimates of Feasibility Measures: Time

Time Frame: Month 12

Time until achieved medication goal per patient will be reported. An achieved medication goal is the following: HbA1c \<8 while taking no sulfonylurea or insulin, or HbA1c between 7.5-8 on sulfonylurea or insulin (these would both meet guidelines-based care.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Rate of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations(Baseline through Month 18)
  • Number of Hypoglycemic Events Requiring Medical Assistance(Time Frame: Baseline through Month 18)
  • Implementation Metric- Value(Baseline through Month 18)
  • Mortality(Baseline through Month 18)
  • Implementation Metric-- Acceptability(Baseline through Month 18)
  • Number of Injurious Falls(Baseline through Month 18)
  • Implementation Metric--Feasibility(Baseline through Month 18)
  • Implementation Metric-- Appropriateness(Baseline through Month 18)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials