MedPath

Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Knee Pain
Registration Number
NCT04925726
Lead Sponsor
Hilal Yeşil
Brief Summary

Water-Based vs. Land-Based Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Middle-Aged Active Patients with a Degenerative Meniscal Tear: A Randomized, Controlled Study

Detailed Description

In this study, we aimed to determine and compare the benefits of water-based exercise (WBE) and land-based exercise (LBE) on pain, functionality, and quality of life after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). Middle-aged (35-50), active 30 patients having APM for a degenerative meniscal tear randomized into LBE (n=15) and WBE (n=15) groups. The pain level (visual analogue scale \[VAS\]), isokinetic muscle strength, quality of life (Short Form-36 \[SF-36\]), and function level (single-leg hop test and Lysholm questionnaire) were evaluated prior to treatment and at follow-up visits at the fourth and eighth week after surgery. The exercise sessions were conducted 3 times a week for 4 weeks in both groups.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria comprised a non-locked painful knee of more than 1 month, age between 35-50 years, a clinical history and examination compatible with degenerative meniscus, positive findings of a degenerative meniscal tear visible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), no response to nonoperative treatment of at least 3 months after onset of symptoms, and no evidence of advanced osteoarthritis (OA) on X-rays or MRI

Exclusion Criteria

The exclusion criteria employed were advanced knee OA, systemic inflammatory disease, a concurrent tear of posterior cruciate ligament, a concurrent collateral ligament repair, other problems causing knee pain (e.g., hip and ankle pathologies), a history of cardiopulmonary disease that could limit isokinetic and functional testing, an unstable medical condition, a serious cognitive deficit, a psychiatric problem, no capacity for independent walking and standing, an open wound on the skin, or pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline VAS (visual analog scale) at 4th and 8th weekup to 8 weeks

The patients were asked to make an assesment of their pain level between 0 and 10 scale

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline Lysholm questionnaire at 4th and 8th weekup to 8 weeks

Eight subtitles are scored differently (limping or use of support: 5 points, locking sensation: 15 points, joint instability and pain: 25 points, swelling: 10 points, stair climbing: 10 points, and squatting: 5 points). The highest and optimal total score is 100 points

Change from baseline isokinetic muscle strength at 4th and 8th weekup to 8 weeks

Isokinetic knee extensor muscle strength of the patients was measured with an isokinetic dynamometer. The test was repeated 10 times at the velocity of 60°/second and 180°/second and peak torque (Nm) measurements were recorded .

Change from baseline quality of life (short form 36) at 4th and 8th weekup to 8 weeks

The physical and mental health summary scores were the primary components used. Scoring is on a scale of 0 to 100 and a higher score reflects better health-related quality of life.

Change from baseline Single-leg hop test at 4th and 8th weekup to 8 weeks

The patient stands on one foot with the big toe touching a line marked on the floor. The participant asked to hop forward as far as possible using the same leg with their arms swing freely on both sides of the body. Distance is measured from the starting point to the heel of the landing leg.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hilal Yesil

🇹🇷

Merkez, Afyon, Turkey

Hilal Yesil
🇹🇷Merkez, Afyon, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.