Brain Characteristics Noted Prior to and Following Treatment

Completed

Conditions: Nonsynostotic Plagiocephaly

Interventions: Other: Non-interventional

Registration Number: NCT02392195

Lead Sponsor: Boston Children's Hospital

Brief Summary: This study will enable investigators to find out if brain structure and characteristics are affected by the shape of the infant's head, and if changes in the brain occur with helmet therapy.

Detailed Description: A dramatic increase in the number of infants diagnosed with Deformational Plagiocephaly (DP) has been observed worldwide since institution of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Back to Sleep Program. According to one published report, the incidence of DP ranges between 3-48%; this translates into120,000-2 million infants/year who develop DP in the United States alone. Some healthcare providers believe that DP is a purely cosmetic condition. This mindset undermines the importance of prevention and correction. In New Zealand, a recent study demonstrated that 39% of children without corrective action had persistent DP at age 3 to 4 years. Additionally, several studies have demonstrated associations between impaired social interactions, developmental problems and DP.Thus some researchers now believe that there may be a spectrum of untoward outcomes from brain remodeling resulting from DP. Recent technological advances now allow the detection of diminutive changes in brain structure. In this multidisciplinary descriptive pilot study we will use brain MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and a cerebral tissue oxygenation monitor, namely Frequency Domain Near Infrared and Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy (FDNIR/DCS) to describe if differences in brain structure and characteristics exist in infants with significant DP before and after correction of the deformational defect. This study will enable investigators to seek preliminary evidence that brain development is influenced by the shape of the cranial vault, and that changes in brain structure and characteristics occur with helmet therapy. Additionally this study will help to determine the need for a larger investigation of this phenomenon that would further establish an association between DP and developmental delay.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 10

Inclusion Criteria

- DP requiring helmet therapy
-Term gestation at birth (37 weeks or greater)
-Less than/or equal to 8 months of age
-No history of major health problem such as birth injury, genetic disorder, intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, neurologic abnormality
-No history of implantable metal device or internal/external orthotic device

Exclusion Criteria

- DP not requiring helmet therapy
-Premature gestation at birth (less than 37 weeks gestation).
-Greater than 8 months of age
-History of major health problem such as birth injury genetic disorder, intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, neurologic abnormality
-History of implantable metal device or internal/external orthotic device
-Infants not completing prescribed treatment for correction with a helmet

Study & Design

Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL

Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Single arm; Non-interventional	Non-interventional	A convenience sample of 10-15 infants born at term gestation, that are \</= 6 months of age with significant DP (defined as head flattening requiring helmet therapy) and no major health issues will be recruited into this phase 1 descriptive pilot study

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of Participants With Qualitatively Determined Normalization of White Matter Pathways	2-6 months	We will compare if nerve pathways are appreciably different in the area of head flattening following helmet therapy by visual examination and comparison of areas of asymmetry vs. symmetry.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of Participants With Improved Developmental Exams Post Helmet Therapy	2-6 months	The Mullen (Scales of Early Learning) was used to determine developmental scores. This tool provides a profile of cognitive ability in five areas: Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Expressive Language, Receptive Language, and Visual Reception. Each of the 5 assessment that has a raw score that is then given a percentile rank and descriptive category (below average, average, above average) for interpretation purposes. Descriptive categories pre treatment were compared to post treatment to determine if scores had improved.