MedPath

Paraorbital-Occipital Alternating Current Stimulation Therapy of Patients With Post-Chiasmatic Lesions

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Incomplete Hemianopia
Hemorrhage
Stroke
Brain Trauma
Complete Hemianopia
Scotoma
Quadrantanopia
Interventions
Device: Verum stimulation
Device: Placebo stimulation
Registration Number
NCT01418820
Lead Sponsor
University of Magdeburg
Brief Summary

Visual field areas, which are not absolutely blind, are hypothesized to have some residual capacities that constitute their potential for vision restoration. Vision restoration can be achieved by varies methods including behavioral training and electrical brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) which are able to influence the excitability and activity of cortical areas.

It is hypothesized that transorbital alternating current stimulation (tACS) can improve the residual field of vision in patients with post-chiasmatic lesions.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
32
Inclusion Criteria
  • lesion of the tractus opticus or of the visual cortex
  • lesion age > 6 months
  • stable visual field defect with residual vision
Exclusion Criteria
  • electric or electronic implants, e.g. heart pacer
  • any metal artefacts in the head
  • Epilepsy
  • Auto-immune diseases in acute stage
  • mental diseases, e.g. schizophrenia etc.
  • diabetic retinopathy
  • addictive diseases
  • blood pressure above 160/100 mmHg
  • instable or high level of intraocular pressure above 27 mmHg
  • retinitis pigmentosa
  • pathological nystagmus
  • presence of an un-operated tumor or tumor relapse (patients with non-progressive tumor are eligible if study participation is recommended by medical authorities)
  • focal findings in EEG or photosensitivity (patients with single seizure more than 10 yrs ago may participate)
  • recurrent transitional ischemic attacks after stroke
  • arteriosclerosis of large blood vessels with stenosis >75%
  • severe coronary heart disease (CHD)
  • unstable angina pectoris
  • diabetes with blood glucose level > 9 mmol/l
  • myocard infarct/ cardiomyopathy
  • ventricular fibrillation
  • risk of vascular thrombosis
  • pregnant or breast-feeding women

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Verum stimulationVerum stimulationrepetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS)
Placebo stimulationPlacebo stimulationcompared to verum stimulation the same electrode montage set-up is used during placebo stimulation, except that placebo patients receive a minimal stimulation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
detection accuracy (%) in visual field measures over baselinebaseline to 8 weeks after stimulation

visual stimuli detection accuracy in residual and absolutely defect visual field will be assessed using computer-based high resolution perimetry (HRP)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
reaction time (ms)baseline to 8 weeks after stimulation

average reaction time in ms, measured by computer-based high resolution perimetry (HRP)

detection accuracy (%) in the intact visual field over baselinebaseline to 8 weeks after stimulation

visual stimuli detection accuracy in the intact visual field will be assessed using computer-based high resolution perimetry (HRP)

EEG parametersbaseline to 8 weeks after stimulation

entrainment of stimulation frequencies (EEG power spectra) and measures of functional connectivity

conventional perimetrybaseline to 8 weeks after stimulation

visual fields obtained by static and kinetic perimetry (average threshold in db, average excentricity in degrees)

visual acuity (LogRAD)baseline to 8 weeks after stimulation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Inst. f. Medical Psychology, Univ. of Magdeburg

🇩🇪

Magdeburg, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath