Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/ACTRN12618000713291
ACTRN12618000713291
Recruiting
Phase 3

Efficacy and safety of local anesthesia in patients with head and neck tumors undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): Lidocaine versus ropivacaine - Prospective, randomized, double blind study

Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa de Francisco Gentil, EPE0 sites30 target enrollmentMay 1, 2018
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsCancerHead and Neck cancer patientsPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)Diet and Nutrition - Other diet and nutrition disordersCancer - Head and neck

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cancer
Sponsor
Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa de Francisco Gentil, EPE
Enrollment
30
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
6 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
May 1, 2018
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa de Francisco Gentil, EPE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with head and neck tumors referedfor PEG placement without systemic analgesic therapy prior to PEG placement
  • •Age 18 years old or older
  • •Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Refusal of the patient
  • •Inability to provide informed consent
  • •Use of systemic analgesics prior to PEG placement
  • •Contraindications for PEG placement (patients unable to take PEG, chronic liver disease, presence of ascites, thrombocytopenia (\<50,000 platelets), coagulopathy (INR\> 1\.5\).
  • •Allergy to lidocaine, ropivacaine, paracetamol, metamizole magnesium or any of its components and excipients

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Not Applicable
A study of the effectiveness of local anesthesia using aerosol sprays and saliva ejectors for bronchoscopy.
JPRN-UMIN000048853Shizuoka Saiseikai General hospital120
Completed
Not Applicable
The analgesic efficacy of infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block when added to local infiltration analgesia and continuous adductor canal block after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trialTotal Knee ArthroplastyPopliteal plexus blockAdductor canal blockLocal infiltration analgesiaEnhanced recoveryOpioid free analgesiaTotal knee arthroplasty
TCTR20180702001none72
Recruiting
Phase 3
Efficacy of local anesthetics given pre-emptively in reducing post- operative pai
CTRI/2018/09/015591SELF
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A study on effectiveness of local anesthetic injected by the pre-administration method in tooth extracted patients with essential hypertensioPeriodontitis Essential hypertension
JPRN-UMIN000028294The Nippon Dental University Niigata Hospital60
Recruiting
Phase 4
Effect of intraoperative use of local anesthetic irrigation during cochlear implant surgery.Health Condition 1: H838- Other specified diseases of innerear
CTRI/2020/12/029684AIIMS Patna