Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2019/01/016821
CTRI/2019/01/016821CompletedPhase 3

A randomized control trial comparing the functional outcomes in patients with post tendon repair mobilized by conventional hand therapy versus assistive device

Department of Orthopaedics0 sites120 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
120
Study OverviewEligibility CriteriaInvestigatorsRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with zone II to zone V flexor tendon injuries who have been operated by early primary tendon repair

Exclusion Criteria

  • •-Patients with associated fractures, nerve and vascular injury along with tendon injuries of the hand which may affect the rehabilitation.
  • •-Patients with tendon injuries of hand with different zones in the same hand
  • •-Patients with combined flexor and extensor tendon injuries of hand.

Investigators

Sponsor
Department of Orthopaedics

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Unknown
A randomized comparative study for functional outcomes of tendon repair in upper limb using different sutures
CTRI/2024/08/072549Mradul Gupta
Completed
Not Applicable
MiTii: A randomised trial of novel web-based upper limb intervention for congenital hemiplegiaCongenital Hemiplegia Cerebral PalsyCongenital HemiplegiaNeurological - Other neurological disordersPhysical Medicine / Rehabilitation - Other physical medicine / rehabilitationCerebral Palsy
ACTRN12611001174976Smart Futures Coinvestment Fund102
Completed
Not Applicable
Randomised controlled trial to compare the functional outcome of the standard NexGen Legacy knee replacement to that of the NexGen Legacy Flex knee replacement which is designed to allow a greater range of flexion in the kneeOsteoarthritis
ISRCTN71676516Queen Margaret University College (UK)80
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of pain relief between intranasal vs spinal nalbuphine in open inguinal hernia surgeries
CTRI/2024/06/068471Saveetha Medical College
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of oral misoprostol vs intracervical Foley catheter for 24 hours for preparation of uterine cervix before induction of labourCervical ripening
SLCTR/2014/030Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology