跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03781141
NCT03781141撤回不适用

Absorbable Versus Non-Absorbable Suture in Carpal Tunnel and Trigger Finger Wound Closure

Mayo Clinic1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 130 人开始时间: 2019年12月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
发起方
Mayo Clinic
入组人数
130
试验地点
1
主要终点
Scar formation with the Patient and Observer Scare Assessment Scale

研究概览

简要总结

Does a difference in patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome exist between wound closure with absorbable or non-absorbable sutures.

详细描述

The study will involve randomizing patients to wound closure with absorbable or non-absorbable sutures. We will if scar formation (symptoms and aesthetics) if different between the two types of closures as determined by the patient and observer scar assessment scale version 2.0 (POSAS) and the patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE), between absorbable and non-absorbable suture for wound closure of open carpal tunnel release and trigger finger pulley release.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Blinded assessment for wound healing

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Any patient greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
  • Any patient undergoing primary open carpal tunnel release or primary trigger finger pulley release

排除标准

  • Any patient identified outside of the proposed study time period.
  • Any patient receiving revision surgery
  • Patients who have had prior ipsilateral palmar or finger surgery
  • Patients with Dupuytren's disease

研究组 & 干预措施

Absorbable suture

Experimental

Wound closure with absorbable suture.

干预措施: Wound closure (Procedure)

Non-absorbable suture

Active Comparator

Wound closure with non-absorbable suture.

干预措施: Wound closure (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Scar formation with the Patient and Observer Scare Assessment Scale

时间窗: 1 year

Blinded scar assessment utilizing the patient and observer scar assessment scale version 2.0 (POSAS). The POSAS is scored from the perspective of the patient and a blinded observer independently. Scores range from 1 to 10 with 1 indicating normal skin and 10 indicating the worst scar imaginable. The 1 to 10 scoring is performed in 6 domains of various scar characteristics to obtain a total score ranging from 10 to 60. Additionally, there is an overall scar appearance score that ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 indicating normal skin and 10 indicating the worst scar imaginable.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Mayo Clinic
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Peter C. Rhee

Principal Investigator

Mayo Clinic

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验