Optimizing Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: a Pilot Study
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Interventions
- Behavioral: MUSIC websiteBehavioral: web-based tool (MAP- Management of Active surveillance in Prostate Cancer)
- Registration Number
- NCT05764005
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
- Brief Summary
This is a pilot evaluation of a patient-centered intervention that enables providers to support men on active surveillance to maximize adherence. Conducted in urology practices, this pilot will measure key patient-reported, provider-reported, and implementation outcomes. Successful completion of this work will inform a subsequent multi-center effectiveness-implementation hybrid design trial and ultimately will improve low-risk cancer management by effectively engaging Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) in care delivery.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- 55 years old or older
- Men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer currently on active surveillance
- Men who identify having a primary care provider
- Access and ability to use the Internet
Patient
- Men who are unable to read and/or speak English
- Men with impaired decision-making capacity (such as with a diagnosis of dementia or memory loss)
PCP Inclusion Criteria:
- Identified by patient on baseline survey as their PCP
Urologist and Clinic Staff Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinicians or staff at a participating urology clinic, including but not limited to MDs, APPs, and nurses
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control MUSIC website MUSIC website This is usual care and all urologists are encouraged to refer their patients to the patient educational materials on the MUSIC website (http://www.musicurology.com/patientmaterials/). Intervention website web-based tool (MAP- Management of Active surveillance in Prostate Cancer) -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Acceptability - Mean Satisfaction Scores up to 4 months post last patient completing intervention Acceptability asks the extent to which participants consider the intervention is agreeable. Patients in the intervention arm will answer questions (on a 5-point Likert scale) regarding the use of the tool including: a) the tool provided me the necessary information about being on active surveillance; b) the tool helped me know what tests I needed and when; c) the tool helped me understand what my PCP can do for my active surveillance; d) the tool was easy to use; e) the amount of time it took to go through the website; and f) I would recommend the tool to other patients. We will ask an open-ended question on if the tool should have any other features in future versions. We will additionally collect paradata such as user actions (clicks) and time spent on each webpage.
Feasibility - recruitment up to 9 months post last patient recruitment Defined as the successful recruitment of 40 patients.
Feasibility - Uptake up to 6 months post last patient recruitment Defined as the proportion of men who complete the baseline and follow-up surveys out of the total number of patients recruited.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States