Assessment of fluid responsiveness by analyzing stroke volume change with Transthoracic echocardiography on passive leg raising test in hemodynamically unstable patients
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Dr Harsh Kumar
- Enrollment
- 93
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Compare changes in Stroke Volume
Overview
Brief Summary
Hemodynamic instability in critically ill patients often prompts fluid resuscitation, yet overzealous fluid administration risks pulmonary edema, intracranial hypertension, and cardiac overload. Traditional static measures like CVP and PAOP poorly predict whether a patient’s cardiac output will actually improve after fluids, whereas dynamic assessments like stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, and especially passive leg raising offer greater sensitivity and specificity. PLR transiently increases preload by shifting venous blood centrally, acting as a reversible, noninvasive self-fluid challenge, and a 10 to 15 percent rise in stroke volume during PLR reliably identifies fluid responders. Transthoracic echocardiography, by measuring LVOT velocity time integral before and after PLR and combining SV changes with cardiac index and IVC collapsibility provides real time,risk free evaluation of fluid responsiveness. This study hypothesizes that PLR induced SV changes measured by TTE can accurately predict which hemodynamically unstable patients will benefit from fluid administration
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18.00 Year(s) to 65.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients or Relatives willing to give consent, Hemodynamically unstable patients, Mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg, need for any vasopressor or ionotropic support, blood lactate levels more than 2 mmol per litre, urine output less than 0.5mlper kg per hr for more than 2hr, tachycardia more than 100 bpm, Signs of hypoperfusion.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Poor cardiac echogenicity, Cardiac arrythmias at the time of study, Aortic valve disease, Contraindications of PLR (Intracranial hypertension, Intra-abdominal hypertension), Venous stasis (DVT),.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Compare changes in Stroke Volume
Time Frame: baseline, 15 minutes
in response to fluid challenge and passive leg raising
Time Frame: baseline, 15 minutes
Secondary Outcomes
- Measure & compare percentage changes in mean value, in response to the PLR test & FC test in mean arterial pressure(baseline , 15 minutes)
- Measure & compare percentage changes in mean value, in response to the PLR test & FC test in ejection fraction(baseline , 15 minutes)
- Measure & compare percentage changes in mean value, in response to the PLR test & FC test in heart rate(baseline , 15 minutes)
- Measure & compare percentage changes in mean value, in response to the PLR test & FC test in IVC diameter(baseline , 15 minutes)
- Measure & compare percentage changes in mean value, in response to the PLR test & FC test in Cardiac Index(baseline , 15 minutes)
Investigators
Dr Harsh Kumar
ESIC Hospital And PGIMSR