Does Dry Needling Affect Treatment Outcomes of Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection in Cervical Disc Herniation?
- Conditions
- Pain, NeckPain, ChronicPain, Myofacial
- Interventions
- Procedure: Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injectionProcedure: Sham dry needlingProcedure: Dry needling
- Registration Number
- NCT04914637
- Lead Sponsor
- Marmara University
- Brief Summary
Chronic neck pain is among the most frequently seen chronic painful conditions. As an important cause of disability, chronic neck pain is a musculoskeletal disorder that negatively affects quality of life. Cervical disc herniation is one of the leading causes of chronic neck pain and conservative methods such as exercise and pain medications are used first in the treatment. In patients unresponsive to conservative treatment, epidural steroid injection is successfully and frequently used treatment option. Epidural steroid injection in the cervical region can be applied with two approaches: interlaminar or transforaminal.
Myofascial trigger point characterized by intramuscular taut band and hypersensitive spots is a condition in which central and peripheral sensitization play a role in the pathophysiology. There are underlying myofascial trigger points in many etiologies that cause chronic neck pain. Trigger points can increase the severity of pain and in some cases they can be the main factor in the etiology of pain. Therefore, the presence of myofascial trigger points should be investigated, even if another cause is detected in chronic neck pain. Dry needling is an easily applicable and effective treatment option in myofascial trigger point.
Although it is well known that myofascial trigger points frequently accompany cervical disc herniation, their effect on treatment outcomes has not been investigated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of dry needling for trigger points on the treatment results of interlaminar epidural steroid injection in patients diagnosed with cervical disc herniation.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 66
- Between the ages of 18-65
- Chronic neck pain due to cervical disc herniation for at least 3 months and being unresponsive to conservative treatment
- Presence of at least one active myofascial trigger point on physical examination of cervical paraspinal muscles, scapulothoracic muscles and extremity muscles.
- Previous surgical/interventional procedure for the cervical region
- Previous application of dry needling/acupuncture to any part of the body
- Presence of other musculoskeletal disorders (such as lateral epicondylitis, tendinitis, entrapment neuropathy) that may cause diagnostic confusion in terms of pain pattern and localization
- Signs of trauma, fracture, malignancy, or active infection
- Rheumatological (RA, AS, etc.), endocrinological (such as osteoporosis, Paget's disease) or another systemic disease that may change the anatomical or physiological structure of the relevant regions
- Presence of coagulopathy
- History of whiplash injury, cervical spinal stenosis, cervical spondylosis
- Have a diagnosis of fibromyalgia
- Being pregnant and breastfeeding
- Presence of mental deterioration or psychiatric/neurological disease that can affect flow of the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description interlaminar epidural steroid injection plus dry needling Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection Fluoroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection will be administered to patients with chronic neck pain due to cervical disc herniation. Also, dry needling will be applied to the active trigger points for the patients in this group. Interlaminar epidural steroid injection will be applied at week 0, while dry needling will be applied in 3 sessions per week (week 0, week 1, week 2). The first session of the dry needling will be in the same day with interlaminar epidural steroid injection. interlaminar epidural steroid injection plus sham dry needling Sham dry needling Fluoroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection will be administered same as the arm titled "interlaminar epidural steroid injection plus dry needling". The only difference in the interventions in this arm is that dry needling is applied without penetrating the skin. The blunt tip of the needle will be used in sham intervention. Interlaminar epidural steroid injection will be applied at week 0, while sham dry needling will be applied in 3 sessions per week (week 0, week 1, week 2) interlaminar epidural steroid injection only Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection Only interlaminar epidural steroid injection will be administered to patients in this arm with the same method as in the other arms (one session, week 0). No dry needling or sham dry needling will be used. interlaminar epidural steroid injection plus dry needling Dry needling Fluoroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection will be administered to patients with chronic neck pain due to cervical disc herniation. Also, dry needling will be applied to the active trigger points for the patients in this group. Interlaminar epidural steroid injection will be applied at week 0, while dry needling will be applied in 3 sessions per week (week 0, week 1, week 2). The first session of the dry needling will be in the same day with interlaminar epidural steroid injection. interlaminar epidural steroid injection plus sham dry needling Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection Fluoroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection will be administered same as the arm titled "interlaminar epidural steroid injection plus dry needling". The only difference in the interventions in this arm is that dry needling is applied without penetrating the skin. The blunt tip of the needle will be used in sham intervention. Interlaminar epidural steroid injection will be applied at week 0, while sham dry needling will be applied in 3 sessions per week (week 0, week 1, week 2)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change of pain severity from baseline to each checkpoints from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 1st hour, 3rd week, 3rd month Pain severity will be assessed with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The patient scores his/her pain between 0-10. Higher score indicates more severe pain
Change of the number of active trigger points from baseline to each checkpoints from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month The number of active trigger points will be determined by clinical examination. The trigger point will be defined as "active" if it causes spontaneous pain or pain occured during the examination is familiar to the patient.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change of the number of the patients with neuropathic pain from baseline to each checkpoints from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month The number of patients with neuropathic pain will be assessed with Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4). Scores ≥ 4/10 indicate presence of neuropathic pain.
Change of depression severity from baseline to each checkpoints from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month Severity of depression will be assessed with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). BDI scoring ranges from 0 to 63, with a high score indicating an increased severity of depression.
Change of the measurement of quality of life from baseline to each checkpoints from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month The measurement of quality of life will be assessed with Short Form-12 Survey (SF-12). Two summary scores are reported from the SF-12 - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). A high score indicates better quality of life.
Change of the measurement of sleep quality from baseline to each checkpoints from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month The measurement of sleep quality will be assessed with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). 7 components are evaluated and each component is scored between 0-3; the total score is between 0-21. Higher total score indicates poor sleep quality.
Change of the pain sensitivity of active trigger points from baseline to each checkpoints from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month The measurement of pain sensitivity will be done by using manual algometer. Measurement will be made from active trigger points and the average of 3 measurements will be taken. The higher score indicates more resistance to pain.
Change of the measurement of disability related with chronic neck pain from baseline to each checkpoints from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month The measurement of disability will be assessed with Neck Disability Index (NDI). The NDI can be scored as a raw score (0-50) or doubled and expressed as a percent (0%-100%). A higher score indicates more activity limitation.
Change of the number of the patients with central sensitization from baseline to each checkpoints from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month The number of patients with central sensitization will be assessed with The number of patients with neuropathic pain will be assessed with Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI). The CSI is composed of two parts: Part A and part B. Only Part A is scored and a score of more than 40 indicates the presence of central sensitisation.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital
🇹🇷Istanbul, Turkey