Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05083715
NCT05083715
Completed
Not Applicable

The Impact of the Head Position on the Occlusion of Implant-supported Fixed Restorations vs. Natural Dentition - a Cross-sectional Analysis

University of Belgrade1 site in 1 country31 target enrollmentSeptember 1, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Dental Occlusion
Sponsor
University of Belgrade
Enrollment
31
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Changes in relative forces strength in 3 different head positions
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The development of a implantology leads to an increasing use of implants in the treatment of care for the loss of one or more teeth. The question is whether the existing guidelines, originally formulated for the occlusion of natural dentition and conventional prosthetic treatment can be applied to the implant prosthodonticsDue to initial differences in the vertical mobility of teeth and dental implants, present in the same dental arch, although the model of occlusion is ideal, undesirable premature occlusal contacts on the fixed dental restorations on implants may be present.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of different head positions on dental occlusion of the natural teeth and fixed dental restorations on implants.

Methods: Volunteers with complete dentition would be included in this study as the Control Group. The Study Group would include subjects with fixed dental restorations on implants in the transcanine region. A T Scan III System will be used for occlusal analysis.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 1, 2017
End Date
September 10, 2019
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ana Todorovic

Senior Lecturer

University of Belgrade

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • For the Test Group
  • patients with implant-supported fixed restorations in at least one quadrant of the posterior region (pre-molar and molar) of both jaws at least for 1 year
  • patients with Angle Class I in MIP
  • patients who did not have orthodontic treatment
  • For the Control group, the inclusion criteria were:
  • patients with completely dentate arches (not considering third molars) with a maximum of 4 tooth-supported restorations per dental arch).

Exclusion Criteria

  • patients with bruxism, detrimental habits, and mandibular parafunctional activities
  • patients with signs of temporomandibular dysfunction, trismus, or illness of the cervical spine
  • patients with a history indicating problems with alcohol or drugs or receiving any psychiatric treatment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Changes in relative forces strength in 3 different head positions

Time Frame: Baseline-1 year

Computerized occlusal analysis

Changes in occlusal contacts distribution in 3 different head positions

Time Frame: Baseline-1 year

Computerized occlusal analysis

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials