CTRI/2021/01/030346
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Sedation verses General Anaesthesia in Inguinal hernia Surgery on Perioperative Outcome in Paediatric Population
I0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- I
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Babies of 0\-3 years age with Inguinal Hernia
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients refusal.
- •Any cardiorespiratory disease.
- •Preterm children.
- •Any congenital deformity.
- •Any comorbidities.
- •Recent infection.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Sedation with Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol in Hysteroscopic Surgery: A Single Center Prospective StudyHysteroscopic surgeryACTRN12618001037291Medeniyet University, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital60
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of sedation efficacy of the two sedative agents: Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in critically ill childreCTRI/2024/06/068582AIIMS Raipur
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison between sedation efficacy of drugs(dexmedetomidine and ketamine)versus (propofol and ketamine) for(ICRT) applicator insertion in cervical cancer patientsCTRI/2022/11/047737CMCH BHOPA
Recruiting
Phase 3
Comparison between sedating effect of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine in intubated poisoned patientsSedation before Intubation.IRCT20211022052838N1Esfahan University of Medical Sciences60
Completed
Phase 4
Comparison sedative effect of Dexmedetomidin & midazolamCondition 1: patients undergoing gastrointestinal Endosonography outside the operating room. Condition 2: .Functional dyspepsiaIRCT20190417043295N1Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences126