Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Technique During Vaginal Surgeries

Not Applicable

Withdrawn

• Conditions: Dural Puncture Epidural Technique
• Interventions: Procedure: Dural puncture epidural; Procedure: Conventional epidural

• Registration Number: NCT04921761
• Lead Sponsor: National Research Centre, Egypt

Brief Summary

The study aims to evaluate whether the dural puncture epidural technique (group B) improves sacral block anesthesia during vaginal surgeries compared with the conventional epidural technique (group A).

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2021-06-05
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-06-09
• Study First Posted: 2021-06-10
• Study Start: 2021-07-01
• Primary Completion: 2021-10-01
• Status Verified: 2021-11
• Study Completion: 2021-11-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-11-13
• Last Update Posted: 2021-11-22

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: WITHDRAWN
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

Age (25- 55) years. Height (150 -170) cm.

Exclusion Criteria

Patient refusal. Hypersensitivity to local anesthetic drugs. Bleeding disorders and coagulopathy. Severe mitral or aortic stenosis. Local or systemic sepsis. Uncooperative patients. Sever spinal deformity. Blood or CSF in the epidural catheter during the procedure. Failure of the block and need for general anesthesia.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Group B	Dural puncture epidural	Women who received the dural puncture epidural technique (group B). Intervention: Procedure: Dural puncture epidural
Group A	Conventional epidural	Women who received the conventional epidural technique (group A). Intervention: Procedure: Conventional epidural

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Time of onset of anesthesia to T10	During surgery
Time for complete motor block	During surgery
Time for first rescue analgesia will be required during surgery	During surgery