Alternative Application Methods of Pre-procedural Povidone Iodine Mouthrinse
- Conditions
- The Retention of Iodine in Saliva Over the TimeThe Comparison of Iodine in Saliva Between Gargle and Swab
- Registration Number
- NCT06272019
- Lead Sponsor
- Chulalongkorn University
- Brief Summary
To compare the iodine remaining in saliva between gargle method and swab method
- Detailed Description
separate the participant in 2 groups group 1 use iodine gargle with gargle method, after 48 hours use iodine gargle with swab method group 2 use iodine gargle with swab method, after 48 hours use iodine gargle with gargle method The researcher will collect saliva before use iodine gargle and after use at time 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120 minutes
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 25
- Thai people
- no underlying disease, no pregnant
- at least 24 teeth
- No use iodine gargle
- No allergy to iodine and seafood
- No orthodontic and prosthetic treatment
- No ulcer and edentulous area
- Saliva flow rate in male (0.57+-0.3 ml/minute), in woman (0.41+-0.27 ml/minute)
- PI score lower than 0.6 (Green and vermillion index)
- treatment orthodontic or prosthetic treatment currently
- Allergy to iodine between reach
- Can not participate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The rate of retention of iodine in saliva 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes The retention of iodine in saliva after get the gargle (show in percentage)
The comparison of the retention of iodine between gargle and swab 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes The comparison of rate of retention of iodine in saliva between gargle and swab (show in percentage)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
🇹🇭Bangkok, Thailand
Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University🇹🇭Bangkok, Thailand