Evaluation of the STEP Intervention for Long-Term Care Residents Facing Hospital Transfer Decisions
- Conditions
- LTC-to-hospital Transfer Decision-making
- Registration Number
- NCT07153341
- Lead Sponsor
- Bruyère Health Research Institute.
- Brief Summary
This trial will evaluate whether the Supporting Transitions and Empowering Preferences (STEP) toolkit can improve decision-making about hospital transfers in long-term care residents and their substitute decision-makers and enhance decision self-efficacy in nursing staff.
The trial will answer the questions:
* Does the STEP tool improve preparation for decision-making during acute health crises?
* Does it reduce decisional conflict and regret in residents and care partners following these crises?
* Does it improve nurse self-efficacy and documentation quality related to hospital transfer decisions?
Participants will:
* Use the STEP tool during key moments of care planning (admission, care conferences, and acute events)
* Complete short surveys measuring their preparedness, decisional conflict, and regret
* Be supported by trained nurses who use STEP to guide hospital transfer discussions
Researchers will compare data collected before and after the STEP tool is implemented at two long-term care homes to see if it improves shared decision-making and documentation related to hospital transfers.
- Detailed Description
Background and Rationale: Transitions from long-term care (LTC) to hospital are complex and can offer both benefits and challenges to residents and care partners. While LTC-to-hospital transitions can improve health outcomes, particularly during acute deterioration, evidence also indicates that these transitions may disrupt continuity of care, increase stress, and misalign resident needs with hospital protocols. Nearly fifty percent of LTC residents in Canada experience hospital transitions annually, with approximately forty percent considered avoidable. Risks include non-evidence-based care, safety concerns, unnecessary interventions, and increased mortality rates. Transition decisions are influenced by residents' health status, medico-legal concerns, staff workload, and care partners' confidence in LTC care. These decisions are often reactive and shaped by unequal power dynamics rather than proactive, collaborative planning.
Given these challenges, and limitations in current monitoring systems such as the Minimum Data Set assessments, there is a critical need for a decision aid that supports informed, resident-centered planning. The Supporting Transitions and Empowering Preferences (STEP) tool was developed through interviews, co-design sessions, document analysis, and stakeholder engagement.
Objectives Primary Objective: Evaluate the impact of STEP on preparation for decision-making among residents and care partners following acute health crises.
Secondary Objectives: Assess the impact of STEP on decisional conflict and decisional regret among residents and care partners.
Tertiary Objectives: Examine the effect of STEP on nurses' self-efficacy as decision coaches and the quality of documentation regarding transition decisions.
Trial Design and Study Setting: A pre-post evaluation will be conducted at two LTC sites (Perley Health and Bruyère Health Saint-Louis LTC) to assess STEP's ability to prepare and support resident-care partner dyads in making hospital transition decisions. STEP will be implemented simultaneously at both sites.
Study Overview: Data will be collected for three months pre-intervention or until the target sample size is reached, followed by the intervention period. Nurses, nurse practitioners, social service workers, and physicians will receive STEP training, with designated champions supporting implementation. Data will be collected at three points: after intake meetings, after care conferences, and after acute events in which a transfer is considered.
Vanguard Phase Implementation: An initial vanguard phase involving approximately ten residents over four to six weeks will test feasibility, refine recruitment, and assess staff comfort before broader rollout.
Description of the Intervention (Overview): The STEP intervention includes two resources: an educational booklet about transition decisions and a structured decision aid. Staff will be trained on both in-person and telephone use, with sessions scheduled to accommodate different shifts. STEP will be introduced at admission, reviewed at post-admission or annual care conferences, and used during acute health events to guide structured conversations about hospital transfer decisions.
Monitoring Fidelity: Implementation fidelity will be monitored through nurse logs, informal discussions, and champion reports, assessing feasibility, acceptability, and adherence.
Data Collection Procedures (Overview): Dyads will be identified through care reports and hospital transfer notifications, with eligibility verified prior to consent. Data will be collected using secure REDCap software. For nurses, care conference and physician call notes will be reviewed to identify eligible cases. Surveys and brief interviews will assess experiences, confidence, and barriers to STEP use.
Analysis: Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat approach using Generalized Estimating Equations for repeated measures. Differences between groups will be examined using t-tests or chi-squared tests. Missing data will be minimized through follow-up; cases lost after three unsuccessful contact attempts will be excluded from analysis.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 300
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Preparation for decision-making At the time of the first transition decision during the study period (up to 12 months) Measured using the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (10 items; each scored 1 \["not at all"\] to 5 \["a great deal"\]; total score 10-50, with higher scores indicating greater preparation to communicate with health care providers and make health-related decisions).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Resident Health Outcomes Post-Transition Measured continuously during the 6 months pre-intervention and 6 months post-intervention periods. Measured as the rate of rehospitalizations within 30 days of discharge among residents who experienced a hospital transition. This outcome will be assessed using electronic medical records, contingent on resident consent and feasibility of participant identification. Higher rates indicate worse health outcomes.
Decisional Conflict Administered by Research Assistant 1-6 weeks after a transition decision. Measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale (16 items; each rated on a 5-point scale; standardized total score 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater decisional conflict and worse decision-making outcomes).
Decisional Regret Administered by Research Assistant 1-6 weeks after a transition decision. Measured using the Decisional Regret Scale (5 items; each rated on a 5-point scale and converted to a 0-100 score, with higher scores indicating greater decisional regret and worse outcomes).
Decision Self-Efficacy Administered by Research Assistant 1-6 weeks after a transition decision and periodically thereafter. Measured using the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale (11 items; each rated 0-4, standardized to a 0-100 score, with higher scores indicating greater decision self-efficacy and better outcomes).
Transition Rate Measured continuously during the 6 months pre-intervention and 6 months post-intervention periods. Measured as the rate of hospital transitions during the pre- and post-intervention periods, including: (1) total number of transitions documented in electronic medical records; (2) avoidable transitions, defined as transitions for conditions that could have been managed in the LTC home (e.g., non-critical infections, falls without significant injury); and (3) repeat transitions, defined as multiple transitions experienced by the same resident within a 6-month period.
Quality of transition documentation Measured continuously during the 6 months pre-intervention and 6 months post-intervention periods. Measured using a checklist-based review of nursing documentation at the time of hospital transitions. Higher scores indicate higher quality and completeness of documentation, while lower scores indicate poorer quality.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Bruyère Health Saint-Louis Long-Term Care
🇨🇦Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Perley Health
🇨🇦Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Bruyère Health Saint-Louis Long-Term Care🇨🇦Ottawa, Ontario, Canada