A study to see which of the two different techniques to get better tissue while doing a biopsy of gastrointestinal and pancreatic lesions while doing it under endoscopic ultrasound guidance.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/02/040100
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Rajneesh Thakur
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.age >18 years,
2.solid pancreatic or extra pancreatic lesions on imaging requiring tissue acquisition,
3.lesions which could be visualized with EUS,
4.lesion should be technically feasible for needle puncture,
5.Informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Age <18 years,
2.cystic lesions of pancreas,
3. inaccessible or non-visualizable lesions at EUS,
4.international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5,
5.platelet count of <50,000 cells/cubic millimeter,
6.unstable clinical conditions or any contraindication for EUS.
7.Inability to give informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method degree of histological adequacy in patients with solid lesions who underwent EUS-FNB using the 20/22 Gauge needle with the conventional stylet slow-pull or the wet aspiration techniques.Timepoint: 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Technical success, <br/ ><br>2.Specimen adequacy <br/ ><br>3.Blood contamination of specimens, <br/ ><br>4.Comparison of the two techniques in terms of sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, positive likelihood ratio, <br/ ><br>5.Final pathological diagnosis. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: over 1 year