Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04466956
NCT04466956CompletedNot Applicable

Virtual Reality as a Distraction Technique for the Management of Acute Pain and Anxiety During Manual Vacuum Aspiration for Miscarriage

Barts & The London NHS Trust2 sites in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
50
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Anxiety Rating

Study Overview

Brief Summary

We are investigating the use of a virtual reality programme to reduce pain and anxiety experienced during manual vacuum aspiration.

Virtual reality (VR) is the computer-generated simulation of a three-dimensional environment that can be interacted with in a seemingly real way by a person using special electronic equipment. In this study a VR headset is worn by the patient allowing them to experience a relaxing environment whilst the procedure manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) is performed.

VR is mostly used in computer gaming but has uses in medical field and has been used in the treatment of long standing pain, treatment of burns, dentistry and treatment of cancer pain. However, its role in the management of pain and anxiety during gynaecological procedures like manual vacuum aspiration has not been researched. This study explores whether it has a place in the treatment of gynaecological pain and reduction of anxiety.

Detailed Description

Many simple gynaecological procedures can be performed in an outpatient setting without the need for general anaesthesia. Such office-based procedures include outpatient hysteroscopy, endometrial biopsy, large-loop-excision of the transformation zone and manual vacuum aspiration for the management of miscarriage. Advantages experienced by patients include reduced anaesthetic risk, enhanced recovery time and flexibility of timings. For the healthcare provider there are significant cost benefits on the basis of reduced theatre time, staff and equipment. Patient satisfaction is generally high but influenced by their experience of pain and feelings of anxiety before, during and after the procedure.

The rationale for this study is to invetsigate the role of distraction techniques and the feasibility of using virtual reality for the management of acute pain and anxiety experienced by patients undergoing manual vacuum aspiration

Primary objective

• Feasibility of using virtual reality as a distraction technique in management of acute pain and anxiety in patients undergoing manual vacuum aspiration for miscarriage.

Secondary objectives

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients: Clinical indications for undergoing an MVA will be confirmed. Inclusion criteria will include all women of 18 - 50 years of age, planned for a MVA who are able and willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Hearing impairments and blindness
  • •History of epilepsy or any previous seizures
  • •Any known anatomical characteristics that may make performing the office procedure more difficult (e.g., cervical conisation)
  • •Any known characteristics that make the patient unsuitable for undergoing MVA (e.g. known bleeding disorder, gestation >12 weeks)
  • •The denial or withdrawal of informed consent

Arms & Interventions

Virtual reality for reduction of pain and anxiety during MVA

Active Comparator

25 participants randomised to use VR headset during MVA and complete questionnaire and short interview regarding experience

Intervention: Virtual reality (Device)

Control group- no VR

No Intervention

25 participants randomised to not use VR headset during MVA and complete questionnaire and short interview regarding experience

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Anxiety Rating

Time Frame: 12 months

Anxiety score (numerical rating score 0 least-10 worst) and questionnaire

Pain Rating

Time Frame: 12 months

Pain score (numerical rating score 0 least-10 worst) and questionnaire

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials