MedPath

The effects of task-oriented training with abdominal drawing-in maneuver in sitting on trunk control, balance, and activities daily living in patients with stroke.

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Diseases of the circulatory system
Registration Number
KCT0008750
Lead Sponsor
Sahmyook University
Brief Summary

trunk control was measured using TIS and PASS. The TIS score in the task-oriented training combined ADIM group increased by 5.15 ± 1.46 points from 13.77 ± 2.24 points before training to 18.92 ± 1.55 points after training, which was a statistically significant increase (p<0.05). The post-hoc test showed that there was a significant dif-ference in the task-oriented training combined ADIM group compared with the task-oriented training group and the control group (p < 0.05). According to the PASS results, the score of the task-oriented training combined ADIM group increased by 2.77 ± 0.51 points from 29.92 ± 1.50 before training to 34.85 ± 1.21 after training, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05), and the post-hoc test showed that there was a signif-icant difference in the task-oriented training combined ADIM group compared with the task-oriented training group and the control group (p < 0.05) FRT value in the task-oriented training combined ADIM group increased by 9.64 ± 3.75 cm from 20.64 ± 5.63 cm before training to 30.28 ± 4.67 cm after training, showing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). In the post-hoc test, there was a significant difference in the task-oriented training combined ADIM group compared with the task-oriented training group and the control group (p < 0.05). According to the BBS results, the score of the task-oriented training combined ADIM group increased by 11.85 ± 5.94 points from 39.23 ± 8.57 before training to 51.08 ± 3.45 after training, showing a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05). In the post-hoc test, there was a significant difference in the task-oriented training combined ADIM group compared with the task-oriented training group and the control group (p < 0.05). The values of weight bearing increased by 8.62% ± 1.94% from 41.62% ± 1.50% before training to 50.23% ± 2.42% after training, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). In the post-hoc test, there was a significant difference in the task-oriented training com-bined ADIM group compared with the task-oriented training group and the control group (p < 0.05) MBI to measure ADL, and the MBI score in the task-oriented training combined ADIM group with abdominal drawing-in increased by 5.85 ± 1.86 points from 67.15 ± 6.72 points before training to 73.00 ± 6.93 points after training, with a statistically signifi-cant increase (p < 0.05). In the post-hoc test, there was a significant difference in the task-oriented training combined ADIM group compared with the task-oriented train-ing group and the control group (p < 0.05)

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
38
Inclusion Criteria

(1) those who had been diagnosed with hemiparesis owing to stroke by a neurologist and rehabilitation specialist; (2) those who developed a brain injury >6 months ago (3) those who had a Mini Mental State Examination-Korean (MMSE-K) score of =21, with the ability to communicate and follow instructions (4) those who had a Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) score of =10 and (5) those who did not have any orthopedic problems that may affect their sitting balance.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with difficulty in understanding the study and those with vestibular or cere-bellar disease

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional Study
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Trunk impairment scale(score);Berg balance scale(score);Modified Bathel index(score)
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Posture assessment scale of stroke(score);Functional reaching test(cm);Weight bearing ratio(%)
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath