Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2019/03/018250
CTRI/2019/03/018250CompletedNot Applicable

Efficacy of blockbuster LMA in comparison to fastrach LMA as a conduit for blind tracheal intubation: A single blind prospective randomized clinical study

S Nijalingappa Medical college1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: March 25, 2019Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Successful blind tracheal intubation through both LMAs

Study Overview

Brief Summary

BlockBuster LMA, A newer supraglottic airway device, is claimed to be an efficient conduit for endotracheal intubation. Intubating LMA is an established device for the same. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate the success rate of blind tracheal intubation using either of these LMAs. Methods : Sixty patients of age group 20-60 years undergoing general anaesthesia were randomised into 2 groups, of 30 patients each, for tracheal intubation using either BlockBuster LMA or Intubating LMA. After induction of anaesthesia, LMAs were inserted and on achieving adequate ventilation with the device, blind intubation was attempted through the suprglottic airway devices. The primary objective was first pass successful intubation and secondary outcomes were ease and time for LMA insertion, oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP) and complications. Data was analysed using SPSS V22 software. Results First attempt success rate of tracheal intubation was 90% in Group B and 66.6% in Group F (P=0.028), while the oeral success rate of intubation was 90% in Group B and 89.9% in Group F (P=0.3). The OSP in Group G was 33.7 and 22 cm H20  in Group F (P=0.001). Complications were less with BlockBuster LMA. Conclusion : BlockBuster LMA provides higher first pass success rate of blind tracheal intubation with less complications.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Computer generated randomization
Masking
Participant Blinded

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20.00 Year(s) to 60.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA status I-III Mallampatti grade I-III Elective and emergency surgeries performed under general anesthesia BMI <35.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient refusal ASA status IV Mallampatti grade IV Mouth opening <2cm Morbid obesity Pregnancy Upper respiratory tract infection Previous airway surgery Patient at risk of regurgitation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Successful blind tracheal intubation through both LMAs

Time Frame: 20 SECONDS AFTER LMA INSERTION

Secondary Outcomes

  • Ease of Lma insertion(Time for insertion of LMA and intubation)

Investigators

Sponsor
S Nijalingappa Medical college
Sponsor Class
Private medical college

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials