Efficacy of blockbuster LMA in comparison to fastrach LMA as a conduit for blind tracheal intubation: A single blind prospective randomized clinical study
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 60
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Successful blind tracheal intubation through both LMAs
Study Overview
Brief Summary
BlockBuster LMA, A newer supraglottic airway device, is claimed to be an efficient conduit for endotracheal intubation. Intubating LMA is an established device for the same. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate the success rate of blind tracheal intubation using either of these LMAs. Methods : Sixty patients of age group 20-60 years undergoing general anaesthesia were randomised into 2 groups, of 30 patients each, for tracheal intubation using either BlockBuster LMA or Intubating LMA. After induction of anaesthesia, LMAs were inserted and on achieving adequate ventilation with the device, blind intubation was attempted through the suprglottic airway devices. The primary objective was first pass successful intubation and secondary outcomes were ease and time for LMA insertion, oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP) and complications. Data was analysed using SPSS V22 software. Results First attempt success rate of tracheal intubation was 90% in Group B and 66.6% in Group F (P=0.028), while the oeral success rate of intubation was 90% in Group B and 89.9% in Group F (P=0.3). The OSP in Group G was 33.7 and 22 cm H20 in Group F (P=0.001). Complications were less with BlockBuster LMA. Conclusion : BlockBuster LMA provides higher first pass success rate of blind tracheal intubation with less complications.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Computer generated randomization
- Masking
- Participant Blinded
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20.00 Year(s) to 60.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •ASA status I-III Mallampatti grade I-III Elective and emergency surgeries performed under general anesthesia BMI <35.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patient refusal ASA status IV Mallampatti grade IV Mouth opening <2cm Morbid obesity Pregnancy Upper respiratory tract infection Previous airway surgery Patient at risk of regurgitation.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Successful blind tracheal intubation through both LMAs
Time Frame: 20 SECONDS AFTER LMA INSERTION
Secondary Outcomes
- Ease of Lma insertion(Time for insertion of LMA and intubation)
