Comparison of First Pass Success Rate in Spinal Anesthesia between Anatomical Landmark Technique and Pre-Procedure Ultrasound Technique in Geriatric Population - A Randomized Control Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Number of passes and attempts
研究概览
简要总结
This is a randomized control trial to compare the outcomes of spinal anaesthesia in geriatric population between two techniques, a pre-procedure ultrasound technique versus the conventional anatomical landmark technique. The study also aims to know whether a pre-procedure ultrasonography reduces the complications of spinal anaesthesia. 50 subjects will be recruited for the study and will be allocated to either group based on computer generated randomization table. In Anatomical group (AG), spinal anaesthesia will be given by the anatomical landmark technique. In Ultrasound group (UG), spinal anaesthesia will be given after a pre-procedure ultrasound. Then, first pass success rate of spinal anaesthesia between two groups will be compared along with other parameters like procedure time, pain during procedure and complications between two groups.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Open Label
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 60.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •requiring spinal anaesthesia for elective surgical procedures.
排除标准
- •a.Patient in pain or discomfort who are unable to cooperate for an ultrasound scan.
- •b.Hemodynamically unstable patients in whom performing the scan can be difficult.
- •c.Patients who had underwent previous spinal surgeries d.Patients with kyphoscoliosis e.Patients who are not suitable for a spinal anaesthesia procedure.
结局指标
主要结局
Number of passes and attempts
时间窗: During Spinal anaesthesia
次要结局
- Procedure time(duration in seconds)
- Complications(2 days)
- Pain during procedure(Numerical rating scale)