Placement of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices by Medicine Faculty Students: A Manikin Study
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 1
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- difficulty of attempts
Study Overview
Brief Summary
When tracheal intubation and face mask ventilation fail, and the insertion of supraglottic airway devices (SHA) can provide ventilation, protecting the patient from hypoxemia. Supraglottic airway devices have become an important part of difficult airway algorithms. The European Resuscitation Council Guidelines recommend supraglottic airway devices for airway management by non-specialized healthcare providers. Education through simulators contributes to the development of students without direct contact with patients. In this study, it was aimed to compare the success of placement of four different supraglottic airway devices on the manikin of term 5 students who participate to the Anesthesiology and Reanimation internship.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Non Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Single Group
- Primary Purpose
- Other
- Masking
- Single (Participant)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 30 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Studying in medical school in term 5
- •To have completed anesthesiology and reanimation internship
Exclusion Criteria
- •who do not want to participate in the study
- •Students with previous experience with four airway devices
Arms & Interventions
Proseal Laryngeal Mask
Intervention: Proseal Laryngeal Mask (Device)
Classic Laryngeal Mask
Intervention: Classic Laryngeal Mask (Device)
I-gel
Intervention: I-gel (Device)
Suprema Laryngeal Mask
Intervention: Suprema Laryngeal Mask (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
difficulty of attempts
Time Frame: during insertion procedure
pointing the difficulty of insertion from 0 to 100
Secondary Outcomes
- Time of attempts(during insertion procedure)
- number of attempts(during insertion procedure)
Investigators
Keziban Bollucuoglu
anesthesiologist
Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
