Accuracy of ERCLMDs in Teeth With Apical Periodontitis
- Conditions
- Apical Periodontitis
- Interventions
- Device: Electronic Root Canal Length Measurement Device
- Registration Number
- NCT01904552
- Lead Sponsor
- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
The aim of this in vivo study is to evaluate the influence of apical periodontitis (AP) on the accuracy of Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5, and i-Root electronic root canal length measurement devices.
- Detailed Description
Thirty-two single-rooted teeth scheduled for extraction, consisting of 16 teeth with AP and 16 teeth with normal periapex (NP), were selected. Access cavity was prepared and coronal portion of the canal was flared. Electronic working length (EWL) was determined by each ERCLMD according to each manufacturer's instructions. Each tooth was extracted and actual working length (AWL) was determined by inserting a size 15 K-file until the tip could be seen at a position tangential to the major foramen and then 0.5 mm was subtracted from the measurement. The distance from the AWL to the file tip was calculated and compared between the two groups by t-test. The accuracy of each ERCLMD within ±0.5 mm was compared between the groups by Fisher's test. Statistical significance was set at P \< .05.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 32
- single-rooted teeth
- clinical pulp necrosis and periapical index scores of 3, 4 or 5
- pulp vitality and a periapical index score of 1
- Teeth with metal restorations
- Teeth with prosthetic crowns
- Teeth with pulp calcification
- Teeth with previous endodontic treatment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description apical periodontitis (AP) Electronic Root Canal Length Measurement Device clinical pulp necrosis periapical index scores of 3, 4 or 5 normal periapex (NP) Electronic Root Canal Length Measurement Device clinical pulp vitality periapical index score of 1
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Actual working length (AWL) 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Electronic working length (EWL) 6 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
🇮🇷Isfahan, Iran, Islamic Republic of