Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07186894
NCT07186894Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Effectiveness and Safety of Cefazolin Versus Antistaphylococcal Penicillins for Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: a Multicentre Real-world Evaluation Using the International TriNetX Database

Central Hospital, Nancy, France0 sites5,000 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2000Last updated:
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
5,000
Primary Endpoint
90 days all-cause mortality

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Background Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia is a common and serious infection, associated with significant morbidity and high mortality rates. Antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) have traditionally been recommended as the first-line treatment. However, this established position has recently been challenged by meta-analyses suggesting that cefazolin may provide comparable efficacy, along with a more favourable safety profile. Further clinical and real-world studies are warranted to substantiate these findings.

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of cefazolin compared with ASPs in the management of MSSA bacteraemia.

Detailed Description

Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a frequent cause of bacteraemia and is associated with high mortality rates. Several studies have reported an increasing incidence over recent decades, accompanied by a decline in the prevalence of methicillin-resistant strains. In a recent meta-analysis by Bai et al., mortality related to S. aureus bacteraemia (SAB) remained substantial: 18.1% at one month, 27.0% at three months, and 30.2% at one year.

In the absence of specific international guidelines supported by randomised controlled trials, the management of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections largely relies on expert consensus and clinical experience. For several decades, antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) have been regarded as the gold standard for treating MSSA bacteraemia. This preference was primarily based on concerns regarding the so-called "inoculum effect," whereby the efficacy of cefazolin might be reduced at high bacterial loads .

However, recurring global shortages of ASPs have led clinicians to consider cefazolin as a viable first-line alternative. In this context, several meta-analyses, albeit based on observational data, have suggested that cefazolin provides similar efficacy with a more favourable safety profile than ASPs . Nonetheless, these results remain subject to confounding and bias and must be confirmed through randomised controlled trials, two of which are currently ongoing.

Large, real-world evaluations are therefore needed to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of cefazolin and ASPs in routine clinical settings. The TriNetX platform offers access to real-time, real-world global hospital data, thereby enabling large-scale comparative analyses in an international context. Against this background, the present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of cefazolin versus ASPs in the treatment of MSSA bacteraemia using data from the TriNetX database.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Retrospective

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Monobacterial methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSa) bacteremia
  • In the cefazolin group : Cefazolin injectable prescription in the week before or the week after MSSa bacteremia
  • In the ASPs group :ASPs injectable prescription (flucloxacillin, floxacillin, cloxacillin, oxacillin, nafcillin and dicloxacillin) in the week before or the week after MSSa bacteremia

Exclusion Criteria

  • In the cefazolin group : ASP injectable prescription in the year before or the year after MSSa bacteremia
  • In the ASPs group : cefazolin injectable prescription in the year before or the year after MSSa bacteremia

Arms & Interventions

Antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs)

ASPs group

Inclusion criteria

  • Monobacterial methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSa) bacteremia
  • Antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) injectable prescription (flucloxacillin, floxacillin, cloxacillin, oxacillin, nafcillin and dicloxacillin) in the week before or the week after MSSa bacteremia

Exclusion criteria : cefazolin injectable prescription in the year before or the year after MSSa bacteremia

Intervention: Antistaphylococcal penicillins (Drug)

Cefazolin

Cefazolin group

Inclusion criteria

  • Monobacterial methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSa) bacteremia
  • Cefazolin injectable prescription in the week before or the week after MSSa bacteremia

Exclusion criteria : ASP injectable prescription in the year before or the year after MSSa bacteremia

Intervention: Cefazolin (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

90 days all-cause mortality

Time Frame: 90 days after the inclusion

All-cause mortality, at day 90

Secondary Outcomes

  • All-cause mortality measured at other timeframes(day 7, day 30, and 1 year)
  • Safety outcomes(30 or 90 days after the inclusion)

Investigators

Sponsor
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

LEFEVRE Benjamin

Doctor (MD PhD)

Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Similar Trials