Comparison between Mulligan Mobilization and Scapular Mobilization versus Spencer Muscle Energy Technique and IASTM in the management of Frozen shoulder.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 74
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Pain
研究概览
简要总结
Need of study:
This study is needed to address the existing gaps in knowledge regarding the most effective manual therapy techniques for treating frozen shoulder. By comparing Mulligan mobilization along with scapular mobilization and Spencer MET along with IASTM, the research will provide valuable insights into the best treatment combinations for improving range of motion, pain management, and functional independence. Ultimately, this could lead to more evidence-based and patient-centered interventions for individuals suffering from frozen shoulder
Aim:
The study aims to evaluate and compare the impact of Mulligan mobilization and Spencer Muscle Energy Technique on pain reduction, functional improvement, and quality of life.
Objectives:
1. To compare the pain relief outcomes between Spencer MET and Mulligan mobilization in frozen shoulder. 2. To evaluate the effect of Mulligan mobilization in improving shoulder Range of motion and QOL in frozen shoulder.
3. To evaluate the effect of Spencer muscle energy in improving Range of motion and QOL in frozen shoulder.
Hypothesis:
Null hypothesis:
Ho1- There is no significant effect of Mulligan mobilization and Scapular Mobilization in improving shoulder Range of motion and QOL in frozen shoulder.
Ho2 – There is no significant effect of Spencer Muscle Energy Technique and IASTM in improving shoulder Range of motion and QOL in frozen shoulder.
Alternate hypothesis:
H11- There is significant effect of Mulligan mobilization and Scapular Mobilization in improving shoulder Range of motion and QOL in frozen shoulder.
H12 – There is significant effect of Spencer Muscle Energy Technique and IASTM in improving shoulder Range of motion and QOL in frozen shoulder.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 40.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •1.Individuals with (Grade 2) Frozen shoulder diagnosed by orthopaedic or clinically diagnosed by therapist. 2.Individuals between the age range of 40 -60 years 3.Both genders.
- •male and female 4.Employed or Unemployed 5.Individuals presenting symptoms present for more than 3 months and restricted movements in ADLs. 6.Individuals whose onset of pathology is unknown or by metabolic disease (diabetes) will also be included.
排除标准
- •Any type of surgical history
- •Pregnancy
- •Vertebral fracture
- •Nerve root irritation
- •Rotator cuff rupture
- •Open wound or skin infection
- •Shoulder Osteoarthritis
- •Any cognitive or neuromuscular disorder
- •History of trauma and fall.
结局指标
主要结局
Pain
时间窗: Baseline Assessment Before intervention. | Follow up Assessment every 2 weeks | Post intervention after 4th week
Range of motion
时间窗: Baseline Assessment Before intervention. | Follow up Assessment every 2 weeks | Post intervention after 4th week
Level of Functional disability
时间窗: Baseline Assessment Before intervention. | Follow up Assessment every 2 weeks | Post intervention after 4th week
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Dr Ayushi Jaiswal
Amity Institute of Health Allied Sciences