MedPath

Imaging and Treatment Planning for Cardiac Radioablation

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Ventricular Tachycardia, Monomorphic
Ventricular Tachycardia (V-Tach)
Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)
Registration Number
NCT06938074
Lead Sponsor
Stewart Gaede
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to (1) determine whether computed tomography (CT) imaging can be used to identify areas of ischemic scar, which are often used as radiation targets for cardiac radioablation, just as well as MRI can, and (2) to determine how best to deliver cardiac radioablation treatment to a patient, for example, which treatment machine should be used and how to limit the effect of chest movement during treatment.

Participants will undergo two separate imaging appointments: one CT imaging appointment, where they will undergo scans including perfusion scans, late enhancement scans, and radiation therapy treatment planning scans; and one MRI appointment, where they will undergo scans including a late enhancement scan. The overlap in areas of ischemic scar as identified in CT scans and MRI scans will be quantified.

Using radiation therapy treatment planning CT scans, the safety and feasibility of different treatment and motion management techniques will be evaluated. Treatment plans will be created using these different techniques and will be compared to one another. These plans will also be evaluated for compliance with dose constraints.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Similarity and overlap of areas of ischemic scar defined in CT and MRI as evaluated by similarity metrics (Dice Similarity Coefficient, Hausdorff Distance)6 months after conclusion of study

Areas of ischemic scar, as defined using CT, will be compared to those defined using MRI.

Safety and deliverability of cardiac radioablation treatments, as evaluated by adherence to institutional dose-volume histogram constraints (safety) and accurate delivery to a phantom (deliverability)6 months after conclusion of study

Treatment plans created using different linear accelerators and motion management techniques will be compared to determine whether dose constraints are met. Plan deliverability will be determined. This will be completed using patient CT scans, patients will not undergo any radiation therapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

London Health Sciences Centre Research Inc

🇨🇦

London, Ontario, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath