跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04087226
NCT04087226
已完成
不适用

Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Displacement by Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) & Conventional Retraction Cord- A Randomized Control Trial

Dow University of Health Sciences1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人2019年10月1日

概览

阶段
不适用
干预措施
未指定
疾病 / 适应症
Gingival Pocket
发起方
Dow University of Health Sciences
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Difference between Mean Horizontal Gingival Displacement by PTFE retraction cord and Conventional retraction cord among sixty participants as assessed by Stereomicroscope.
状态
已完成
最后更新
5年前

概览

简要总结

To achieve harmony between restoration and surrounding periodontium, soft tissue management plays a pivotal role. Various Gingival displacement techniques show varying results in achieving the goals of displacement. The most preferred method of displacement by dental practitioners is through conventional retraction cord made up of cotton, which besides its advantages, poses certain drawbacks, including low tear strength, high friction, and fiber remnants within the sulcus.

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) retraction cord, is a fluoropolymer, known for its high tear strength, low friction, and bio-compatibility.

This study aims to determine the difference of horizontal gingival displacement between PTFE and conventional retraction cord.

Participants inducted in this study will be assessed for eligibility. qualifying subjects will receive crown preparation for Porcelain-fused to-metal crown. subjects will then be randomly allocated to either of the two arms of intervention. After making a pre-displacement impression, Retraction cord will be applied for 3 minutes, then removed to record post-displacement impression.

the difference in pre and post-displacement mean gingival sulcus width will be assessed by a stereomicroscope using image analysis software.

注册库
clinicaltrials.gov
开始日期
2019年10月1日
结束日期
2020年9月30日
最后更新
5年前
研究类型
Interventional
研究设计
Parallel
性别
All

研究者

责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Humera Nasim

Principal Investigator

Dow University of Health Sciences

入排标准

入选标准

  • Indication of full veneer crown
  • Age group: 18-60 years
  • Probing Depth 2-3mm and no bleeding on probing
  • No signs of gingival/periodontal disease

排除标准

  • Indication of subgingival margin location
  • Developmental anomaly (anatomical) affecting abutment tooth
  • Bleeding disorder
  • Pregnancy

结局指标

主要结局

Difference between Mean Horizontal Gingival Displacement by PTFE retraction cord and Conventional retraction cord among sixty participants as assessed by Stereomicroscope.

时间窗: 3 minutes after displacement

次要结局

  • Difference between Post-displacement Bleeding by PTFE and conventional retraction cord among sixty participants by visual assessment(immediately after cord removal)
  • Difference between ease of Application of PTFE and conventional retraction cord among sixty participants.(immediately after cord removal)

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验